Liste des Groupes | Revenir à ras written |
On Tue, 13 Aug 2024 08:29:33 -0700, Paul S PersonInteresting! Thank you for the 2/3 review. As someone said in some random interview I vaguely remember... "the clue is in the name" (of the lab). ;)
<psperson@old.netcom.invalid> wrote:
>>Given our librarians' choices of late in our local library I think>
I'll trust my own instincts thank you very much.
>
Though to their credit they did get a couple of interesting books on
COVID. I'm currently reading "What REALLY happened in Wuhan"
China blocked WHO from investigating for 3 weeks, I do wonder what
_really_ happened there!
I'm now about 2/3 of the way through that book and it seems that the
Chinese were doing 'gain of function research' (which translates into
'how can we make this coronavirus MORE infectious and thus more
dangerous' research) with a fair amount of cooperation from US
researchers despite numerous broken Chinese promises on lab access.
>
The author is making a fairly strong case for the 'lab leak' theory
rather than deliberate release - thus culpable manslaughter not
murder.
>
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.