Re: Whoops! The Atlantic Makes Trump Look EPIC In Cover Intended as a Smear

  On Mon, 23 Sep 2024, Scott Lurndal wrote:
 

D <nospam@example.net> writes:

>
On Mon, 23 Sep 2024, D wrote:
>

These models have done a good job of simulating past climates, from the ice
ages to Eocene warmth, to Pangean Monsoons and Holocene lake levels in east
Africa.  Your source here is simply incorrect.
>
They have also made the above correct predictions (do I have to repeat them
for the tenth time?).  Neither of the ideas you propose above have made any
correct predictions.
>
"Flawed" has become a word which means nothing more than "I disagree".
It is meaningless without being able to point to an actual flaw.

>
Incorrect. They are just models, and past patterns do not guarantee
future performance. It is easy to create any model you want, to show any
result you need.
>
This reliance on models instead of proof, is another huge weakness of
climatologists and completely undermines their theories.

>
Good evening William, I found a great article on the unreliability of
models and why we cannot rely on them. I hope you enjoy the read!

>
William wrote  that he participated in the development of
the models.   The Hoover institute doesn't do scientific research,
nor does it employ scientists.   The author of the report you
quoted is an economist, the other works for a pharmaceutical company.
>
>
(BTW - did you get permission to respost the copyrighted content
you lifted from their website)?
>

 Anything about the content or only meta?