Re: Whoops! The Atlantic Makes Trump Look EPIC In Cover Intended as a Smear

On 9/24/2024 10:11 PM, Titus G wrote:

On 23/09/24 11:09, William Hyde wrote:

Cryptoengineer wrote:
>

>
Over the decades, I've observed that when a Usenet flamefest degrades
to the point that the participants are arguing about how they are
arguing, there's no point in paying much attention.

>
In general, I don't expect these to be read.

 I think D is the funniest troll we have had for ages. I also think most
here will be reading and appreciating your posts as I do. As I do not
have a background in any relevant science, I am also ignorant, not
concerned enough to alter that state as I am confident that GW is AGW
and have been so for some time but nowhere near as long Exxon Mobil et
al back in the 60s or 70s?
 

Considering that scientists 100 years ago were writing about the possibility of changes to the climate as a result of industrial pollution and exhaust I'd say, yes, as long as Exxon/Mobil et al.
--
I've done good in this world. Now I'm tired and just want to be a cranky dirty old man.