Sujet : Re: Can CHATGPT or Google Gemini write Sci-fi
De : ahasuerus (at) *nospam* email.com (Ahasuerus)
Groupes : rec.arts.sf.writtenDate : 05. Oct 2024, 16:36:30
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vdrmdu$q2le$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 10/4/2024 10:13 PM, Chris Buckley wrote:
On 2024-10-04, The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
A question for discussion.
It's bee happening for a couple of years already. Why should it stop
> now that the AI is better?>
NY Times 2/23/2023
And now, it seems, it's happening in real life. The editors of three
science fiction magazines — Clarkesworld, The Magazine of Fantasy &
Science Fiction, and Asimov's Science Fiction — said this week that
they had been flooded by submissions of works of fiction generated
by A.I. chatbots.
According to Neil Clarke's (the editor of _Clarkesworld_) post on February 15, 2023 (
https://neil-clarke.com/a-concerning-trend/):
> I’m not going to detail how I know these stories are “AI” spam or
> outline any of the data I have collected from these submissions.
> There are some very obvious patterns [snip]
I guess we could rephrase the original question: "Can CHATGPT or Google Gemini write SF that is not obviously AI-generated? And if they can't do it now, what about 1-3-5-10 years from now?" As Clarke wrote in his post:
> the technology is only going to get better, so detection will become more challenging