Re: Can CHATGPT or Google Gemini write Sci-fi

On Sat, 5 Oct 2024 11:36:30 -0400, Ahasuerus <ahasuerus@email.com>
wrote:

On 10/4/2024 10:13 PM, Chris Buckley wrote:

On 2024-10-04, The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:

A question for discussion.

 
It's bee happening for a couple of years already. Why should it stop
now that the AI is better?>
NY Times 2/23/2023
   And now, it seems, it's happening in real life. The editors of three
   science fiction magazines — Clarkesworld, The Magazine of Fantasy &
   Science Fiction, and Asimov's Science Fiction — said this week that
   they had been flooded by submissions of works of fiction generated
   by A.I. chatbots.

>
According to Neil Clarke's (the editor of _Clarkesworld_) post on
February 15, 2023 (https://neil-clarke.com/a-concerning-trend/):
>

I’m not going to detail how I know these stories are “AI” spam or
outline any of the data I have collected from these submissions.
There are some very obvious patterns [snip]

>
I guess we could rephrase the original question: "Can CHATGPT or Google
Gemini write SF that is not obviously AI-generated? And if they can't do
it now, what about 1-3-5-10 years from now?" As Clarke wrote in his post:
>

the technology is only going to get better, so detection will become

more challenging

I believe there is work being done on that -- that is, leaving
clues/marks that something is generated by AI.

Of course, the only effect if this is doable and accepted at all will
be two classes of AI: those that conform (and, if appropriate, are
legal) and those that don't (and, if appropriate, are illegal).
--
"Here lies the Tuscan poet Aretino,
Who evil spoke of everyone but God,
Giving as his excuse, 'I never knew him.'"