Sujet : Re: xkcd: Solar Protons
De : bliss-sf4ever (at) *nospam* dslextreme.invalid (Bobbie Sellers)
Groupes : rec.arts.sf.writtenDate : 12. Oct 2024, 01:19:22
Autres entêtes
Organisation : dis
Message-ID : <vecfab$3rsm0$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 10/11/24 14:27, Scott Lurndal wrote:
Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> writes:
On 10/11/2024 2:44 PM, Cryptoengineer wrote:
On 10/11/2024 3:07 PM, Lynn McGuire wrote:
xkcd: Solar Protons
https://www.xkcd.com/2997/
>
Uh, Solar Protons are not going to directly form water. But we do
need the rain here in Texas as we are in a drought again.
>
Explained at:
https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/2997:_Solar_Protons
>
I went out and photographed the aurora last night here in MA.
>
It may be visible again tonight.
>
pt
>
I did not see anything here in south Texas last night at 1 am.
>
Texas is far too south.
https://www.swpc.noaa.gov/communities/aurora-dashboard-experimental
And San Francisco had a lot of Fog. But we saw very pretty pictures like red velver drapes floating with the breeze from areas more blessed with Aurora Borealis visibility.
bliss
-- b l i s s - S F 4 e v e r at D S L E x t r e m e dot com
xkcd: Solar Protons
Re: xkcd: Solar Protons