Re: (ReacTor) Complete Planetary Destruction Is Not as Easy as It Seems

Liste des GroupesRevenir à ras written 
Sujet : Re: (ReacTor) Complete Planetary Destruction Is Not as Easy as It Seems
De : (at) *nospam* ednolan (ted@loft.tnolan.com (Ted Nolan)
Groupes : rec.arts.sf.written
Date : 18. Oct 2024, 20:15:17
Autres entêtes
Organisation : loft
Message-ID : <lnfqe5ForphU1@mid.individual.net>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : trn 4.0-test76 (Apr 2, 2001)
In article <veuan4$3e3hr$1@dont-email.me>,
Robert Carnegie  <rja.carnegie@gmail.com> wrote:
On 13/10/2024 21:29, The Horny Goat wrote:
On Thu, 10 Oct 2024 17:54:19 -0500, Lynn McGuire
<lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> wrote:
 
"It is Earth year 2213—but, of course, there is no Earth anymore. Not
since it was burned to a cinder by the sun, which has mysteriously begun
the process of going supernova. The human race has fled to Mars, but
this was only a temporary solution while we have prepared for a second
trip: a one-hundred-fifty-year journey to a distant star, our best guess
at where we might find a new home."
 
There's a massive difference in mass between the size of a future nova
and a future supernova - and our Sun is barely big enough for a nova
future and far below that of a supernova so I tend to look askance at
any author who describes the future Sun in that way.
 
In any case short of Lex Luthor or similar villain creating a devise
to detonate the sun, that particular probably is 4-5 billion years out
which is rather longer than I expect to be here to have that problem
to face.
>
As I said on the page, I think I heard that
in about one billion years, the Sun will be
slightly hotter, and Earth's water will all
be evaporated in the atmosphere.
>
The water that we're made of.

I'm moving: 500,000 years here tops.
--
columbiaclosings.com
What's not in Columbia anymore..

Date Sujet#  Auteur
10 Oct 24 * (ReacTor) Complete Planetary Destruction Is Not as Easy as It Seems16James Nicoll
10 Oct 24 +- Re: (ReacTor) Complete Planetary Destruction Is Not as Easy as It Seems1Garrett Wollman
11 Oct 24 +- Re: (ReacTor) Complete Planetary Destruction Is Not as Easy as It Seems1Bobbie Sellers
11 Oct 24 `* Re: (ReacTor) Complete Planetary Destruction Is Not as Easy as It Seems13Lynn McGuire
11 Oct 24  +* Re: (ReacTor) Complete Planetary Destruction Is Not as Easy as It Seems3William Hyde
11 Oct 24  i`* Re: (ReacTor) Complete Planetary Destruction Is Not as Easy as It Seems2Lynn McGuire
12 Oct 24  i `- Re: (ReacTor) Complete Planetary Destruction Is Not as Easy as It Seems1Dimensional Traveler
14 Oct 24  +* Re: (ReacTor) Complete Planetary Destruction Is Not as Easy as It Seems6Robert Woodward
14 Oct 24  i`* Re: (ReacTor) Complete Planetary Destruction Is Not as Easy as It Seems5ted@loft.tnolan.com (Ted Nolan
14 Oct 24  i +* Re: (ReacTor) Complete Planetary Destruction Is Not as Easy as It Seems3Don_from_AZ
14 Oct 24  i i+- Re: (ReacTor) Complete Planetary Destruction Is Not as Easy as It Seems1Scott Dorsey
15 Oct 24  i i`- Re: (ReacTor) Complete Planetary Destruction Is Not as Easy as It Seems1Christian Weisgerber
20 Oct 24  i `- Re: (ReacTor) Complete Planetary Destruction Is Not as Easy as It Seems1ted@loft.tnolan.com (Ted Nolan
14 Oct 24  +- Re: (ReacTor) Complete Planetary Destruction Is Not as Easy as It Seems1Lynn McGuire
18 Oct 24  `* Re: (ReacTor) Complete Planetary Destruction Is Not as Easy as It Seems2Robert Carnegie
18 Oct 24   `- Re: (ReacTor) Complete Planetary Destruction Is Not as Easy as It Seems1ted@loft.tnolan.com (Ted Nolan

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal