Re: It is not just Physics that Should be Hard in Hard SF

Liste des GroupesRevenir à ras written 
Sujet : Re: It is not just Physics that Should be Hard in Hard SF
De : bliss-sf4ever (at) *nospam* dslextreme.com (Bobbie Sellers)
Groupes : rec.arts.sf.written
Date : 21. Oct 2024, 01:58:01
Autres entêtes
Organisation : nil
Message-ID : <vf48uq$hv07$9@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 10/20/24 17:43, Don wrote:
Bobbie Sellers wrote:
  Don wrote:
 <snip>
 
Bobby Sellers, how do you imagine Poirot's being Belgian precludes his
(and Christie's own) Francophilia? Or perhaps, as you see it, their
Francophilia is also imaginary? (In the latter case we'll agree to
disagree.)
>
        Since you cannot spell my name correctly I will agree to disagree with
your opinion on Poirot, Don. It is obvious to me
that you are suffering from a visual handicap so I will not
say that you imagine Francophilia where none exists. I will
further not accuse you of Francophobis
 A thousand pardons Bobbie. Something unrelated only now occurs, although
it's been there all along. How impolitic of me!
 Allow me to atone. Replace "Francophilia" with "Frenchness." As in
Poirot's clear and logical mind demonstrates his Frenchness. Regard
Poirot's Francophilia a regretable mistake made in haste to appease
the almighty alliteration.
     At the time my little grey cells told me it was wrong. But synonym
fossick fatigue forced me to post it as is.
 Danke,
 
Have you considered the possibility that you are discounting Belgian culture of the presumed time? Do you remember that he was up
and coming in the Belgian Police when he encountered a case that it
was un-politic to solve? Now you might make the argument that many
European States and even in the Americas, France was the nation to
look to for fashion and style. But that is not Franco-philia but
the desire for style and to be thought to be fashionably attired
and hair styled in the the latest mode.
bliss
--
b l i s s dash s f 4 e v e r at d s l e x t r e m e dot c o m

Date Sujet#  Auteur
21 Sep 24 * It is not just Physics that Should be Hard in Hard SF39Robert Woodward
22 Sep 24 +* Re: It is not just Physics that Should be Hard in Hard SF35Ahasuerus
7 Oct 24 i`* Re: It is not just Physics that Should be Hard in Hard SF34Don
10 Oct 24 i `* Re: It is not just Physics that Should be Hard in Hard SF33Kevrob
11 Oct 24 i  +* Re: It is not just Physics that Should be Hard in Hard SF5Scott Dorsey
11 Oct 24 i  i+* Re: It is not just Physics that Should be Hard in Hard SF2ted@loft.tnolan.com (Ted Nolan
11 Oct 24 i  ii`- Re: It is not just Physics that Should be Hard in Hard SF1Scott Dorsey
12 Oct 24 i  i`* Re: It is not just Physics that Should be Hard in Hard SF2James Nicoll
12 Oct 24 i  i `- Re: It is not just Physics that Should be Hard in Hard SF1Scott Dorsey
11 Oct 24 i  `* Re: It is not just Physics that Should be Hard in Hard SF27Don
11 Oct 24 i   `* Re: It is not just Physics that Should be Hard in Hard SF26Bobbie Sellers
12 Oct 24 i    +- Re: It is not just Physics that Should be Hard in Hard SF1Paul S Person
17 Oct 24 i    +- CRITICAL by Robin Cook1Don
20 Oct 24 i    `* Re: It is not just Physics that Should be Hard in Hard SF23Robert Carnegie
20 Oct 24 i     +- Re: It is not just Physics that Should be Hard in Hard SF1Bobbie Sellers
20 Oct 24 i     `* Re: It is not just Physics that Should be Hard in Hard SF21Scott Dorsey
20 Oct 24 i      `* Re: It is not just Physics that Should be Hard in Hard SF20Don
20 Oct 24 i       +* Re: It is not just Physics that Should be Hard in Hard SF9William Hyde
21 Oct 24 i       i`* Re: It is not just Physics that Should be Hard in Hard SF8Robert Woodward
21 Oct 24 i       i +* Re: It is not just Physics that Should be Hard in Hard SF6Don
21 Oct 24 i       i i`* Re: It is not just Physics that Should be Hard in Hard SF5Paul S Person
22 Oct 24 i       i i +* Re: It is not just Physics that Should be Hard in Hard SF2Lynn McGuire
23 Oct 24 i       i i i`- Re: It is not just Physics that Should be Hard in Hard SF1Don
23 Oct 24 i       i i `* Re: It is not just Physics that Should be Hard in Hard SF2Cryptoengineer
23 Oct 24 i       i i  `- Re: It is not just Physics that Should be Hard in Hard SF1Dimensional Traveler
21 Oct 24 i       i `- Re: It is not just Physics that Should be Hard in Hard SF1Paul S Person
20 Oct 24 i       +* Re: It is not just Physics that Should be Hard in Hard SF8Bobbie Sellers
21 Oct 24 i       i`* Re: It is not just Physics that Should be Hard in Hard SF7Don
21 Oct 24 i       i +* Re: It is not just Physics that Should be Hard in Hard SF2Bobbie Sellers
21 Oct 24 i       i i`- Re: It is not just Physics that Should be Hard in Hard SF1Don
22 Oct 24 i       i `* Re: It is not just Physics that Should be Hard in Hard SF4Scott Dorsey
22 Oct 24 i       i  +- Re: It is not just Physics that Should be Hard in Hard SF1Don
22 Oct 24 i       i  `* Re: It is not just Physics that Should be Hard in Hard SF2Don
22 Oct 24 i       i   `- Re: It is not just Physics that Should be Hard in Hard SF1Paul S Person
21 Oct 24 i       `* Re: It is not just Physics that Should be Hard in Hard SF2Paul S Person
21 Oct 24 i        `- Re: It is not just Physics that Should be Hard in Hard SF1William Hyde
12 Oct 24 `* Re: It is not just Physics that Should be Hard in Hard SF3Robert Carnegie
12 Oct 24  `* Re: It is not just Physics that Should be Hard in Hard SF2Paul S Person
12 Oct 24   `- Re: It is not just Physics that Should be Hard in Hard SF1William Hyde

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal