Re: (ReacTor) Five SF Scenarios Involving the US Presidential Line of Succession

Liste des GroupesRevenir à ras written 
Sujet : Re: (ReacTor) Five SF Scenarios Involving the US Presidential Line of Succession
De : alan (at) *nospam* sabir.com (Chris Buckley)
Groupes : rec.arts.sf.written
Date : 21. Oct 2024, 13:44:04
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <lnn0kkFriqoU1@mid.individual.net>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
User-Agent : slrn/1.0.3 (Linux)
On 2024-10-20, William Hyde <wthyde1953@gmail.com> wrote:
Chris Buckley wrote:
>
>
Can Maryland be compelled  to take DC back?  I'd be very surprised if
that were so.
 
The Maryland *legislature* gets to vote on DC; the *residents* don't.
>
So Maryland cannot be compelled to take DC back.

William, I don't understand what you're trying to say here.  I've been
(at least in my mind) very precise about what I believe the requirements
are. I'll try again: DC can be joined to Maryland without the general
population of Maryland voting on the issue. DC cannot be joined to Maryland
without the general population of *DC* voting on the issue. What is it
you don't understand?

The *DC residents* do get to vote.
>
Do you have any evidence that their vote is binding?  The constitution
seems to be pretty clear that the federal government can do what it
wants with DC.

What does "binding" mean here? I believe it is *necessary* for DC residents
to vote in favor of DC joining Maryland in order for it to happen.
Matters of statehood require consent. (Note: having DC vote with
Maryland does not constitutionally require DC to consent, though I'm
sure they would be given the option. Congress did not require
DC residents to vote when Congress disenfranchised them.)

And all this is quibbling about a possibility that nobody is working
towards. There is no movement to have DC join Maryland. It's currently
a false choice.

Nonetheless, Democrats seem to want to set the voting rights debate to
be that choice between DC joining Maryland or DC becoming a state
itself.  The polls and DC referendum don't mention other
possibilities. The Washington Post poll you quoted had *9* questions
for Marylanders about DC voting rights and statehood. As expected, not
a single one mentioned the possibility of DC voting with Maryland, a
path that's been proposed in Congress for decades by Republicans.
Democrats seemingly don't want that option discussed.

The Democrats don't care about DC voting rights nearly as much as they
care about 2 more Senators.

Chris

Date Sujet#  Auteur
8 Oct 24 * (ReacTor) Five SF Scenarios Involving the US Presidential Line of Succession43James Nicoll
8 Oct 24 +* Re: (ReacTor) Five SF Scenarios Involving the US Presidential Line of Succession41Paul S Person
8 Oct 24 i+* Re: (ReacTor) Five SF Scenarios Involving the US Presidential Line of Succession2Bobbie Sellers
9 Oct 24 ii`- Re: (ReacTor) Five SF Scenarios Involving the US Presidential Line of Succession1Bobbie Sellers
9 Oct 24 i`* Re: (ReacTor) Five SF Scenarios Involving the US Presidential Line of Succession38Cryptoengineer
9 Oct 24 i `* Re: (ReacTor) Five SF Scenarios Involving the US Presidential Line of Succession37Paul S Person
9 Oct 24 i  `* Re: (ReacTor) Five SF Scenarios Involving the US Presidential Line of Succession36Cryptoengineer
10 Oct 24 i   `* Re: (ReacTor) Five SF Scenarios Involving the US Presidential Line of Succession35Paul S Person
10 Oct 24 i    `* Re: (ReacTor) Five SF Scenarios Involving the US Presidential Line of Succession34William Hyde
11 Oct 24 i     `* Re: (ReacTor) Five SF Scenarios Involving the US Presidential Line of Succession33Dimensional Traveler
11 Oct 24 i      +* Re: (ReacTor) Five SF Scenarios Involving the US Presidential Line of Succession25William Hyde
14 Oct 24 i      i`* Re: (ReacTor) Five SF Scenarios Involving the US Presidential Line of Succession24Chris Buckley
14 Oct 24 i      i `* Re: (ReacTor) Five SF Scenarios Involving the US Presidential Line of Succession23William Hyde
14 Oct 24 i      i  +* Re: (ReacTor) Five SF Scenarios Involving the US Presidential Line of Succession4Scott Dorsey
15 Oct 24 i      i  i`* Re: (ReacTor) Five SF Scenarios Involving the US Presidential Line of Succession3Chris Buckley
15 Oct 24 i      i  i `* Re: (ReacTor) Five SF Scenarios Involving the US Presidential Line of Succession2Cryptoengineer
15 Oct 24 i      i  i  `- Re: (ReacTor) Five SF Scenarios Involving the US Presidential Line of Succession1ted@loft.tnolan.com (Ted Nolan
15 Oct 24 i      i  `* Re: (ReacTor) Five SF Scenarios Involving the US Presidential Line of Succession18Chris Buckley
15 Oct 24 i      i   `* Re: (ReacTor) Five SF Scenarios Involving the US Presidential Line of Succession17William Hyde
16 Oct 24 i      i    `* Re: (ReacTor) Five SF Scenarios Involving the US Presidential Line of Succession16Chris Buckley
16 Oct 24 i      i     `* Re: (ReacTor) Five SF Scenarios Involving the US Presidential Line of Succession15William Hyde
16 Oct 24 i      i      +* Re: (ReacTor) Five SF Scenarios Involving the US Presidential Line of Succession9Chris Buckley
17 Oct 24 i      i      i`* Re: (ReacTor) Five SF Scenarios Involving the US Presidential Line of Succession8William Hyde
19 Oct 24 i      i      i `* Re: (ReacTor) Five SF Scenarios Involving the US Presidential Line of Succession7Chris Buckley
19 Oct 24 i      i      i  +* Re: (ReacTor) Five SF Scenarios Involving the US Presidential Line of Succession4Dimensional Traveler
19 Oct 24 i      i      i  i+* Re: (ReacTor) Five SF Scenarios Involving the US Presidential Line of Succession2Bobbie Sellers
20 Oct 24 i      i      i  ii`- Re: (ReacTor) Five SF Scenarios Involving the US Presidential Line of Succession1Dimensional Traveler
21 Oct 24 i      i      i  i`- Re: (ReacTor) Five SF Scenarios Involving the US Presidential Line of Succession1Chris Buckley
20 Oct 24 i      i      i  `* Re: (ReacTor) Five SF Scenarios Involving the US Presidential Line of Succession2William Hyde
21 Oct 24 i      i      i   `- Re: (ReacTor) Five SF Scenarios Involving the US Presidential Line of Succession1Chris Buckley
16 Oct 24 i      i      `* Re: (ReacTor) Five SF Scenarios Involving the US Presidential Line of Succession5Scott Dorsey
17 Oct 24 i      i       +* Re: (ReacTor) Five SF Scenarios Involving the US Presidential Line of Succession3Robert Woodward
17 Oct 24 i      i       i`* Re: (ReacTor) Five SF Scenarios Involving the US Presidential Line of Succession2Paul S Person
18 Oct 24 i      i       i `- Re: (ReacTor) Five SF Scenarios Involving the US Presidential Line of Succession1Robert Woodward
17 Oct 24 i      i       `- Re: (ReacTor) Five SF Scenarios Involving the US Presidential Line of Succession1William Hyde
11 Oct 24 i      +- Re: (ReacTor) Five SF Scenarios Involving the US Presidential Line of Succession1Paul S Person
11 Oct 24 i      +* Re: (ReacTor) Five SF Scenarios Involving the US Presidential Line of Succession4Paul S Person
11 Oct 24 i      i+- Re: (ReacTor) Five SF Scenarios Involving the US Presidential Line of Succession1Scott Dorsey
12 Oct 24 i      i`* Re: (ReacTor) Five SF Scenarios Involving the US Presidential Line of Succession2Dimensional Traveler
12 Oct 24 i      i `- Re: (ReacTor) Five SF Scenarios Involving the US Presidential Line of Succession1Paul S Person
12 Oct 24 i      +- Re: (ReacTor) Five SF Scenarios Involving the US Presidential Line of Succession1Paul S Person
14 Oct 24 i      `- Re: (ReacTor) Five SF Scenarios Involving the US Presidential Line of Succession1Scott Dorsey
8 Oct 24 `- Re: (ReacTor) Five SF Scenarios Involving the US Presidential Line of Succession1ted@loft.tnolan.com (Ted Nolan

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal