Re: Whoops! The Atlantic Makes Trump Look EPIC In Cover Intended as a Smear

On Mon, 28 Oct 2024 21:53:01 -0400, Cryptoengineer
<petertrei@gmail.com> wrote:

On 10/28/2024 4:50 PM, D wrote:

 
 
On Mon, 28 Oct 2024, Scott Lurndal wrote:
 

Dimensional Traveler <dtravel@sonic.net> writes:

On 10/28/2024 7:26 AM, Bobbie Sellers wrote:

On 10/28/24 01:49, The Horny Goat wrote:

On Sun, 27 Oct 2024 18:16:03 -0700, Bobbie Sellers
<bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> wrote:
>

????????Harris is not trash but an elected Vice President who did
everything
asked of her by her President. Now she is running at
his instigation since her policies will aline more with his than
most others. She served as Attorney-General to the State of
California
which is bigger than Autearoa both in population and surface area.

>
I dunno - judging by his behalf since July it seems almost certain
Biden was pushed, he didn't leap off himself. There have been all
sorts of stories to the effect that Obama and Clinton told him
contributors wouldn't contribute if he was on the ballot after that
catastrophic first debate but nobody's saying anything for sure - but
no question any time Biden has appeared on camera he seemed grumpy
about not leading the ticket.

>
 ????????I sent him a note asking him to stay as a candidate since
he is slightly younger than myself and he has done a great job. He
was pressured into resigning his candidacy by people like Nancy
Pelosi. I don;t think the people putting the pressure on Biden
were the people choosing Harris. She was Biden;s choice out of
all the other prospective candidates in 2020 and the American
people voted them into offie.
>
 ????????last night after i finished my note to the fellow in
Anteroa(?) shut down my computer and went to bed I realized
that the slurs on Biden he repeated were certainly Trumpite
but from the Putin wing of the Republican Party. Several of
the people riding on Trump's coat tails like Hauley and
MTG are simply following the Putin line ofstructing aid
to the Ukraine on specious grounds. Obstructing the bill
to enhance border security so that the Border Patrol
does not get the new officers it needs badly to do its
Duty properly. Of course when the undocumented persons
are in the USA it is largely Republicans who exploit their
labor as Trump himself has done in the past.
>

Anyone who has done a honest study on illegal immigration in the US has
concluded that the American economy is DEPENDENT on the labor of
illegals.  Our economy would crash without them.
>

>
Indeed, immigrants add 2 trillion dollars a year to the
USA GDP.
>
https://theconversation.com/proof-that-immigrants-fuel-the-us-economy-
is-found-in-the-billions-they-send-back-home-227542

 
Haha, nice! The conversation, as everyone knows, is yet another
socialist rag and nest of woke vipers.

>
From this, it appears that, since you are unable to fault the
logic of the article's argument, you resort to ad hominem
attacks on the source.

Generally, it is indeed. And his language certainly suggests a certain
bias. On his part.

But you /really/ have to wonder if it wouldn't have more ...
credibility ... if Fox News made the argument. Or the BBB. Or a
longstanding conservative association of farmers. Or the owners of
construction businesses.

Depending on how socialist theconversation.com actually is, of course.

"Consider the source" has been good advice for a long long time.

This is a well known logical fallacy.
https://www.logicalfallacies.org/ad-hominem.html

Their first example, in my experience, fails: liars lie. Verification
of their statements is needed.

Their second is fine.
--
"Here lies the Tuscan poet Aretino,
Who evil spoke of everyone but God,
Giving as his excuse, 'I never knew him.'"