Re: AGW. LNG Worse Than Coal.

On 10/30/24 13:55, Scott Dorsey wrote:

Bobbie Sellers  <blissInSanFrancisco@mouse-potato.com> wrote:

>
More Putin BS propaganda. LNG is about 50% better for the
environment than coal or 100% better than the way Russian Troops
have treated Nuclear Reactor power plants.

 Maybe.  The problem is that LNG if it escapes into the environment is a
worse greenhouse gas than CO2, although not as stable.  So if you take
into account the large amounts of gas lost to the atmosphere with fracking,
I could see it looking pretty bad.
 Of course, the solution for this isn't to abandon natural gas but to
seal systems better and reduce waste.
--scott
 

There are lots of Methane leaks from fields in Southern
California and all over the world wherever oil was sought as well
there are leaks from garbage dumps where decomposition is taking
place. The evidence is riff that the clathrates undersea are
melting and releasing methane while the Permafrost is collaping
into large pits releasing more methane. Satellites are detecting
plumes of this gas in the atmosphere.
All fossil fuels will be abandoned becuse the Climate Warming will make it impossible to handle. Think about the temperatures that
gasoline ignites at and which promotes its vaporizastion.
When the Ports are flooded how will tankers get close enough
to transfer petroleum?  And the last fossil fuels will be used
to power miliary equipment.
If you want read about how we would cope with that read
the Emberverse series by S. M. Stirling. It starts with the destruction
of the usefulness of technology as presently deployed.  That would
kill me but aside from that off-putting realization it is very powerful
series. But his inventiveness seemed to have flagged at the 3rd
generation post-Change..
bliss