Sujet : Re: AGW. LNG Worse Than Coal.
De : nospam (at) *nospam* example.net (D)
Groupes : rec.arts.sf.writtenDate : 31. Oct 2024, 21:30:12
Autres entêtes
Organisation : i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID : <33a2343e-d2db-0eda-7929-076d53c613d6@example.net>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
On Thu, 31 Oct 2024, Bobbie Sellers wrote:
On 10/31/24 11:58, Lynn McGuire wrote:
On 10/31/2024 11:06 AM, Paul S Person wrote:
...
yes and it has a short half life in the atmosphere but we
humans tilted the balance with our COO emissions. All for the sake
of faster and easier.
bliss
No, for the sake of civilization.
Somehow, I never thought of (say) Assyria or Classical Greece as
making massive CO2 emissions.
Yet both were civilizations.
Our present civilization is built on cheap energy. Getting rid of fossil fuels today would cause a huge population crash across the planet. Maybe a 10X crash. The primary cause of the crash would be the lack of tractors and harvesters. The secondary cause of the crash would be fertilizers.
Lynn
>
Global warming is going to result in many deaths because
fertile lands are already being flooded, See Bangladesh.
Incorrect. The planet is greening, harvest seasons lengthening. Also notes that we've been able to handle floods since the chinese were fighting with the yellow river a few 1000 years ago. So there are no worries on that front.
AGW. LNG Worse Than Coal.
Re: AGW. LNG Worse Than Coal.
