Re: “Climate Change over the past 4000 Years”

On Fri, 6 Dec 2024, William Hyde wrote:

D wrote:

  On Thu, 5 Dec 2024, William Hyde wrote:
 

D wrote:

  On Thu, 5 Dec 2024, William Hyde wrote:
 

D wrote:

  On Wed, 4 Dec 2024, Scott Lurndal wrote:
 

Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> writes:

On 12/3/2024 7:59 PM, Bobbie Sellers wrote:

On 12/3/24 17:01, Lynn McGuire wrote:

???Climate Change over the past 4000 Years???

 

I have quite a bit of experience running forced flow and natural flow
reactors.  Sol acts exactly like a natural flow reactor with both short
and long cycles of variability.

 You have zero climate science background, so your experience with
non-nuclear reactors seems somewhat irrelevent.

 Nonsense. Climate "science" is political. The real stuff is climate science reduced to physics.

 Let's try a little test, shall we?
 What do you think is used to create climate models?
 No cheating, no looking it up.  I want to know what you thought at the time you wrote the above.
 William Hyde

 That models can be whipped up at will, based on the directions of the people who are funding it. Climate gate is an excellent example of the corruption in the field. It was probably just the tip of the iceberg.

 That is not an answer to the question I asked.
 Try again.
 William Hyde
 

 Incorrect. If you want another answer, please rephrase the question.

>
The question is quite clear, as is your refusal to answer it, which speaks volumes about you.
>
Any honest debater learns the other side's case.  Trolls on the other hand ...
>
William Hyde

No, it is not clear. I you asked, I answered, you say I did not, I asked you to rephrase, you did not. The troll in this case, I'm afraid, is on the other side.