Re: Anthropogenic Climate Change Denialism in SF

Liste des GroupesRevenir à ras written 
Sujet : Re: Anthropogenic Climate Change Denialism in SF
De : g (at) *nospam* crcomp.net (Don)
Groupes : rec.arts.sf.written
Date : 07. Dec 2024, 16:23:01
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <20241207b@crcomp.net>
References : 1
Robert Woodward wrote:
I know of one book, _The Last Centurion_ by John Ringo (published in
2008). There are probably others. What is really odd about _tLC_, is
that there was a pandemic starting, IIRC, in 2019 (a really nasty one -
world fatalities, IMS, exceeded 1 billion). Oh, yes, the US presidential
administration flubbed the response, big time (I believe the president
was a "Hillary Clinton" pastiche). There was significant turmoil over
the 2020 Presidential election as well.

THE HIDDEN TRUTH by Schantz is a Young Adult set in an alternate reality
where Gore became President. In this reality the White House was hit on
9-11.

    President Lieberman got Congress to pass the Preserving
    our Planet's Future Act as a monument to the late President
    Gore. A key part of the plan to decrease greenhouse gas
    emissions and rein in global warming involved a carbon tax
    that opponents, like Dad, called the "Gore Tax." Global
    temperatures had stopped rising and in fact levelled off in
    the years since the plan passed. A strong consensus of
    scientists all agreed that the President's action had
    averted global disaster, yet some extremists denied there
    was a connection between the law and the climate. It was all
    just a coincidence and natural variation, they claimed. Dad
    followed climate-denier websites like wattsupwiththat.com
    where skeptics argued that because carbon dioxide levels had
    continued to rise while temperatures levelled off, the Gore
    Tax was ineffective. But any number of climate scientists
    had models proving just how much worse greenhouse gases and
    temperatures both would have been without the law. I'd tried
    discussing the scientific consensus and the importance of
    saving the planet from climate change with Dad, but he was
    just too stubborn to listen to me.


    ... several chapters later ...


    "Do you recall the Whiskey Rebellion?"

    I'd read about that in Paul Johnson's A History of the
    American People. "Sure. Frontier folk in Pennsylvania
    couldn't get their corn to market because the expense of
    carting it in bulk across the mountains was too high. So,
    they distilled it to whiskey which made it more portable.
    But then, the federal government started taxing whiskey
    and they rebelled. Washington sent the Army in to restore
    control."

    "Yeah, that's the gist of it," Uncle Rob agreed. "That's
    what gave me the idea. Up and down the Appalachians
    there's natural gas wells. Not so many in these hills,
    but more up into Kentucky and West Virginia. Part of the
    Gore Tax included a heap of new regulations on how to
    transport natural gas. The regulators carefully crafted
    the rules in collusion with Tolliver Corporation and some
    of the other large energy companies who were big campaign
    contributors. They engineered the regulations to make it
    very difficult for small independents to get their natural
    gas transported to market at any reasonable expense. So
    most of their wells are idle and their owners are losing
    their shirts. It's the same problem as faced those
    frontiersmen with all the bulky corn they couldn't
    transport. How did they solve it?"

    "By distilling it down to a more compact form," I answered.
    "You mean chilling and liquefying the natural gas?"

    "Sharp kid," Uncle Rob said to Dad. "But, not quite there
    yet," he said to me. "Liquefied natural gas, chilled and
    compressed to make it more compact is a standard technique.
    But, the energy companies and their lobbyists thought of
    that. They forbid shipping liquefied natural gas by tanker
    truck except for very short distances. And somehow, while
    it is perfectly safe and acceptable to truck gas from a
    rail depot or a distributor to a customer, when the gas is
    being moved the other direction from a gas field to a rail
    depot or to a distributor or directly to an end user, it
    suddenly becomes too dangerous to transport on a truck.
    The upshot of it is, if you don't have a rail spur to your
    gas field, you pretty much can't ship your gas in compact
    liquefied form which means it just isn't economical to ship."

    "So how do you ship it?" I asked.

    "You don't," Uncle Rob grinned. "That's the beauty of it. If
    you can't bring your natural gas to your customer, you bring
    your customer to your natural gas." I was confused. Uncle Rob
    continued. "Your Mom and Dad engineered a mobile system in a
    cargo container for compressing, liquefying, and distilling
    air. It burns natural gas to drive the compressor and chiller.
    We truck our rig on up to a natural gas field, and we tap
    into what would otherwise be an idle well for a few hours. We
    burn the natural gas and collect the liquefied compressed air
    into tanker trucks: about four tanker trucks of liquid nitrogen
    for every tanker truck of liquid oxygen. We have a small tank
    that collects the residue of argon and heavier gasses. Our
    production method isn't as efficient as big fixed plants, but
    our energy costs are way lower. The small independents are
    happy to get a market for natural gas they otherwise couldn't
    sell, and we're able to get a steep discount. The rules for
    trucking compressed liquefied oxygen and nitrogen are still
    much less stringent than for liquefied natural gas.

Danke,

--
Don.......My cat's  )\._.,--....,'``.     https://crcomp.net/reviews.php
telltale tall tail /,   _.. \   _\  (`._ ,.    Walk humbly with thy God.
tells tall tales.. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'    Make 1984 fiction again.


Date Sujet#  Auteur
7 Dec 24 * Anthropogenic Climate Change Denialism in SF7Robert Woodward
7 Dec 24 +- Re: Anthropogenic Climate Change Denialism in SF1Don
7 Dec 24 `* Re: Anthropogenic Climate Change Denialism in SF5James Nicoll
7 Dec 24  +- Re: Anthropogenic Climate Change Denialism in SF1Lynn McGuire
8 Dec 24  `* Re: Anthropogenic Climate Change Denialism in SF3Robert Woodward
8 Dec 24   +- Re: Anthropogenic Climate Change Denialism in SF1James Nicoll
10 Dec 24   `- Re: Anthropogenic Climate Change Denialism in SF1quadibloc

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal