Re: “JK Rowling Details Cost Of Speaking Out On Trans Issue, Blasts NYT ‘Rewriting Of History’”

On Sun, 15 Dec 2024 00:51:27 +0000, Robert Carnegie
<rja.carnegie@gmail.com> wrote:
 

On 04/12/2024 02:00, Scott Dorsey wrote:

Paul S Person  <psperson@old.netcom.invalid> wrote:

>
What is strange is that the obvious solution -- four teams/leagues
instead of two -- does not appear to have occurred to anyone.

>
Or just one for all genders.
--scott

>
Are we talking about sports teams or about
"debating" gender and transgender issues?
I thought Paul was referring to the latter.

 I was, and I think the rejoinder is too.
 To be sure, it completely ignores the reason we have boys and girls
teams/leagues/tournaments/awards in the first place. And the reason
Federal Law requires (IIRC) schools receiving Federal Funds to have
girls teams/leagues/tournaments/awards that are provided just as
seriously as the boys' teams/leagues/tournaments/awards are.
 Note that the Supremes have already ruled that at least one part of
Federal Law concerning "discrimination by sex" /does/ apply to
transgender. IIRC, they were astounded that this wasn't clear to
everybody and that they had to point it out.
 A certain D. Trump will, of course, shortly be reversing all of this.
Or at least trying to do so.