Re: stats 2024

On Fri, 3 Jan 2025 17:34:32 -0000 (UTC), doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The
Doctor) wrote:

In article <lk3gnjllrhri50javvqo96s83cujmsbqte@4ax.com>,
Paul S Person  <psperson@old.netcom.invalid> wrote:

On Thu, 2 Jan 2025 15:16:07 -0500, Tony Nance <tnusenet17@gmail.com>
wrote:
>

On 1/1/25 1:44 PM, Bice wrote:

On Wed, 01 Jan 2025 03:33:30 -0700, The Doctor
<doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
 

Group : rec.arts.sf.written
Statistics : from 1/1/2024 to 12/31/2024
>
***** Users with most messages *****
num| Name                        | Nb Msg | size       | or. | %
>

----|-----------------------------|--------|------------|-----|------------------|

84 | Bice                        |      1 |      1,651 |   0 |  0.01%

 
I think there's something wrong with whatever you're using to come up
with these stats.  I don't post often, but I knew I had definitely
posted more than once in the last year.  So I went back and counted
and found a dozen posts I sent to rec.arts.sf.written in 2024.
 
   -- Bob (Bice)
 

>
Yeah, spot-checking my own and a few others, the numbers in the original
post line up closely with an aggregate tally for Sept-Dec.

>
Perhaps the earlier months have been deleted from its database. Or
something like that.

<snippo sig, which a proper client should be doing anyway>

Anyone else wishes to try either Xananews or MesNews?

I think that, if you are going to post these at all, and we find
reason to believe that the data is wrong, /you/ are the one who should
do the checking.

If only out of pride in your work.
--
"Here lies the Tuscan poet Aretino,
Who evil spoke of everyone but God,
Giving as his excuse, 'I never knew him.'"