Sujet : Re: Nebula Finalists 2016
De : psperson (at) *nospam* old.netcom.invalid (Paul S Person)
Groupes : rec.arts.sf.writtenDate : 07. Jan 2025, 17:22:45
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <1qkqnjhj03regmd1rtp9a9mr8kb3it4it4@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
On 6 Jan 2025 16:28:50 GMT, Chris Buckley <
alan@sabir.com> wrote:
On 2025-01-04, Paul S Person <psperson@old.netcom.invalid> wrote:
Next up: Jan 6
>
I've seen reports of planned demonstrations. Let's hope Biden ensures
tight-enough security to prevent any intrusions.
>
And show the Republicans how a /real/ President protects critical
events.
>
Paul, as I'm sure you know from the massive statements of the Jan 6
Committee (what? They didn't publicize this? How ... strange), the
House Sergeant-at-Arms, Paul Irving, had primary responsibility for
the security of all members of Congress.
>
Irving and the Senate Sergeant-at-Arms are also in charge of the
Capitol Police, with any request for things like National Guard
support having to get approved by them before being forwarded. On
January 4th, the Capitol Police chief requested the National Guard be
put on emergency standby but Irving said no, he didn't like the way it
would look and he would have to get approval from his boss, Nancy Pelosi
(Democratic Speaker of the House). That never happened.
>
Pelosi on January 6th privately took responsibility for the Capitol Police
not having the resources to stop the riot.
https://x.com/OversightAdmn/status/1800207258514575730?mx=2
Somehow, that was never investigated or reported by the January 6th Committee.
How...strange.
>
Security on January 6th was definitely looked at at the highest levels,
including in meetings with Trump. A transcript of the Chairman of the
Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Mark Milley, includes
https://app.box.com/s/w1mdlicby1o9wrcpfhtdoxi9aljwptos/file/1640163916382
[January 3, 2021] The President just says, Hey, look at
this. Theres going to be a large amount of protesters here on the
6th, make sure that you have sufficient National Guard or Soldiers
to make sure its a safe event. And [Acting SecDef] Miller
responds by saying, "Hey, we've got a plan, and we've got it
covered'"
This is the first time I've looked at some of the transcripts. They
really were considering threats, including locations and capabilities
of people like the Proud Boys in the Joint Chiefs of Staff meetings when
talking about preparations for January 6th.
>
So what should a "real" president do, Paul? Do Pelosi's job for her?
If that's what it took.
If a State Governor can call out the National Guard to guard
something, POTUS can do ... a lot more.
And it is strange, is it not, that in all the excuses and wrangling
after Jan 6 2021 not one Republican, not even Donald Trump, /ever/
claimed that he had ordered to US Army to make sure it was a safe
event.
No, we had to find out about from a DOD IG Report -- which some
Republicans are, now that they are aware of it, claiming was an "order
from the CiC of the US Army" and threatening Milley with prosecution.
Because /any/ excuse will do when someone lies like a rug.
-- "Here lies the Tuscan poet Aretino,Who evil spoke of everyone but God,Giving as his excuse, 'I never knew him.'"