Sujet : Re: (ReacTor) Troubled Waters: Five SFF Works About Rivers
De : (at) *nospam* ednolan (ted@loft.tnolan.com (Ted Nolan)
Groupes : rec.arts.sf.writtenDate : 17. Jan 2025, 17:33:08
Autres entêtes
Organisation : loft
Message-ID : <luvf24FaqpdU1@mid.individual.net>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : trn 4.0-test76 (Apr 2, 2001)
In article <
vmdv8p$42qe$1@dont-email.me>,
Dimensional Traveler <
dtravel@sonic.net> wrote:
On 1/17/2025 7:50 AM, James Nicoll wrote:
In article <m2ikqde9q3.fsf@kelutral.omcl.org>,
Steve Coltrin <spcoltri@omcl.org> wrote:
begin fnord
jdnicoll@panix.com (James Nicoll) writes:
>
[Riverworld]
>
My memory is that each new volume was a bit more meh than the one
before.
>
It's pretty much a geometric series converging on "not as bad as Chalker
at his worst... quite".
It's like Lost, in that the questions were far more interesting than the
answers.
The producers of 'Lost' never HAD any answers, they just threw shit at
the viewers with no intention of providing answers.
>
I didn't see "Lost" so I have no opinion about that, but in Riverworld,
we were explicitly told things which were retconned to be false. I very
rarely like that.
-- columbiaclosings.comWhat's not in Columbia anymore..
(ReacTor) Troubled Waters: Five SFF Works About Rivers
Re: (ReacTor) Troubled Waters: Five SFF Works About Rivers