Liste des Groupes | Revenir à ras written |
Bobbie Sellers wrote:Why would that be? Science and technology seem to work veryOn 1/16/25 11:54, Anonymous wrote:Says who? You? Actual Russians tend to disagree.Cryptoengineer wrote:>On 1/10/2025 10:39 AM, Dimensional Traveler wrote:>On 1/10/2025 6:47 AM, Scott Lurndal wrote:>Cryptoengineer <petertrei@gmail.com> writes:He's also been beating "The Ukrainians should be part of Russia" drum for some time now.On 1/9/2025 3:20 PM, Lynn McGuire wrote:>Pearls Before Swine: Uncle Is Not Good With Money>
https://www.gocomics.com/pearlsbeforeswine/2025/01/09
>
Yeah, we knew that already. Uncle has given several hundred billion
dollars to Ukraine. Might as well set the money on fire and thrown it
in Atlantic.
>
Lynn
>
I would not have pegged Lynn as one of Putin's Useful Idiots.
Given his book reviews are mostly prepper porn, one
should have expected it. Lynn _wants_ to see the disintegration
of the United States.
>
I don't want to just see Ukraine get back its territory.
>
I'd like to see the Russian Empire broken up,
The homosexuals running NATO want the same thing.
Well that would be for the best for the Russians
and for the rest of the world. The Russian Empire under the SovietHomosexuals and Shaniquas are not capable of producing tritium and plutonium-238.
system, the present system and the Czarist system brutalized
the peoples of the Empire.
I really doubt that homosexuals are running NATO but
if they are I believe they are well-educated and doing the
best job they can.
>>>
Russia, however, has WORKING thermonuclear bombs and delivery systems.
So does the USA, North Korea, China, Pakistan, the UK, France and likely
Israel.
bliss - hobbling onAs a matter of fact we in the USA alone likely have enough
nuclear weaponry to destroy civilization but that would mean the
billionaires in the USA, the Oligarchs in Russia, the Authoritarians
in China would have to forgo profits to be made.
So it is not very likely.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.