Re: Pearls Before Swine: Uncle Is Not Good With Money

On Wed, 22 Jan 2025, Bobbie Sellers wrote:

On 1/22/25 08:07, Chris Buckley wrote:

On 2025-01-21, Scott Lurndal <scott@slp53.sl.home> wrote:

Paul S Person <psperson@old.netcom.invalid> writes:

On Mon, 20 Jan 2025 23:01:51 -0600, Lynn McGuire
<lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> wrote:
 

On 1/19/2025 10:07 AM, Scott Lurndal wrote:

kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey) writes:

Paul S Person  <psperson@old.netcom.invalid> wrote:

It confused Saddam Hussein too, who thought the Americans were his =

ally

until the bombs actually started dropping.

 But ... but ... but ... the Shrub /had/ to remove the blot on the
family eschuteon from his father's failure to remove Saddam in the
early 90s.=3D20
 His good buddies, the Republicans, told him so.

 With friends like that, who needs enemies?
 My suspicion is that his father will be known to history as one of =

the

best presidents of the 20th century in great part because he knew
when to get into a war and when to get out.  His son will be known as
one of the worse presidents because he didn't.

=20
=

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historical_rankings_of_presidents_of_the_Un=
ited_States#Scholar_survey_summary

=20
Purportedly objective criteria:
=20
GHWB is around 19th or 20th best.
Obama is 7th.
Carter is 22nd.
Nixon 35th
Trump, 45th.   The bottom of the list.

 The TDS is strong with this one.

 You are, of course, looking in the mirror when you type that.

 Lynn is a typical trumper - instead of evaluating the data and
providing a cogent rebuttal, he responds with namecalling.
 He also doesn't realize that the Wikipedia article collects
the analysis of historians who base their rankings on the
evaluation of each term using a set of consistent and concrete
criteria.

 You seem to live in a very different world than I do, Scott.
Please supply your data and cogent rebuttal about namecalling.
In my world, the namecalling and personal attacks in this newsgroup
in recent years has almost exclusively been done by the liberals here,
as witness the past few days.
 You also don't realize that current historians are almost all liberals and
Democrats (well over 95%).  There are very few Republican historians out
there. Those opining on the rankings and setting up the criteria and
weighting by which to judge are Democrats. Their opinion of Trump is not
a surprise.
 Chris

>
If there are indeed few Republican Historians it may reveal the
weakness of the Republican Party in regarrd to adopting #45 with his
fascist ideas as a candidate once more.

Trump Derangement Syndrom. Bobbie, please do note that help is available if you need it. Do yourself a favour and seek out a good psychologist. This "fascist"-drama is fantasy and you are getting more and more disconnected from the real world.

He has been busy and one of the things he has done is reverse
the sentence of the man behind the Silk Road site selling drugs and
murder to the best of my recollecion.
>
He is all for suppression of voting rights and birthright citizenship. Acting very badly from my Independent POV.

No, he is strengthening voting rights by making sure that americans, and americans only, can vote. Xiden was the traitor here, since he stole the election (that's proven) and also tried to rally illegal immigrants to vote for him.

Among other things Presidential Biographies and the
Constitution of the USA have been removed from the official
web site.
It is all Trump's will to remove all possible competition
for public attention.

He is our president, and is governing the US wisely. He is crushing socialism, and rebuilding the values that made the US great. We are fortunate to have him, and if you repent, he will forgive you as well.

bliss - hobbling off into the electronic void.
>
>