Re: Pearls Before Swine: Uncle Is Not Good With Money

On 2025-01-25, Scott Lurndal <scott@slp53.sl.home> wrote:

Chris Buckley <alan@sabir.com> writes:

On 2025-01-24, Paul S Person <psperson@old.netcom.invalid> wrote:

>

Paul, exactly how does my claim regarding historians show hyperbole?
>
I gave a citation and facts. Having 33 registered Democrats for every
registered Republican among historians seems like good evidence to me.

>
It is completely meaningless.  You haven't shown that political
registration has any impact on their output.

You've given up on your "reset" sub-thread already? Given the number of false
statements you've made, that's understandable.

You're now in the double digit number of false statements you've made in
this thread that I've pointed out.  You have defended exactly one, and
your main defense there was that it was deliberately false. Could be,
but how is a reader supposed to know the difference between that and
all your other very obviously false factual statements?

As far as political objectivity goes:
The two authors of the survey compared the results this time versus
their previous survey 6 years ago, pointing out that every single
modern Democratic President went up in rank and that every single
modern Republican President went down in rank! (I don't know how far
back "modern" goes; they specifically mentioned Carter so at least
that far.)  Exactly how does that happen with a "politically
objective" survey?

Chris