Sujet : Re: 25 Classic Books That Have Been Banned
De : rich.ulrich (at) *nospam* comcast.net (Rich Ulrich)
Groupes : rec.arts.sf.written alt.usage.englishDate : 14. Feb 2025, 18:53:41
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <g50vqj5o63a79v69bpj6o9es2jk7da1441@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
On Fri, 14 Feb 2025 08:46:55 +1100, Peter Moylan <
peter@pmoylan.org>
wrote:
On 14/02/25 08:21, D wrote:
On Wed, 12 Feb 2025, Judith Latham wrote:
>
Catch-22 by Joseph Heller
>
Excellent! Will read again.
>
I did read it again, and was disappointed. Somehow, for me, it had lost
its air of originality. I'd almost classify it as a "read once" book.
Many of the other books on the list can be read with pleasure multiple
times.
"Read once" vs. "read multiple times" -
In my youth, almost every book of fiction was "read once".
I read fast, but I remembered large amounts word-for-word
and that made re-reading less pleasant. But I did develop a
habit of re-reading series, where the latter stories added
depth to what I had picked up on first-read.
I still read fast, which I've realized is often "too fast."
Especially, I still missed a lot of social interplay and clever
dialog, even though I try to pay more attention. These days,
I'll re-read a book within a few weeks if I did enjoy it.
Back in the early days when I seldom re-read, the one book
that fascinated me enough to re-read was "Cat's Cradle."
To my surprise, it did not surprise me at all -- it seemed to
evoke only the same insights and reactions that had impressed
me on the first reading.
>
Having said that, I still acknowledge that Catch-22 is an important
literary work. In fact, when I released my mailing list manager, I
called it MajorMajor.
-- Rich Ulrich