Liste des Groupes | Revenir à ras written |
On Thu, 20 Feb 2025 22:20:53 +0100, nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J.That would be James G. Watt, Reagan's first secretary of the interior and future felon.
Lodder) wrote:
Scott Dorsey <kludge@panix.com> wrote:Refreshing as it is to hear that the viewpoint is fading away, it is
>Paul S Person <psperson@old.netcom.invalid> wrote:>The USA (or predecessor colonies) took out the buffalo (well, nearly)>
and the passenger pigeon (permanently), but the DoDo and others were
the responsibility of others.
I don't feel bad about the dodo, which apparently tasted fishy and greasy,
but the passenger pigeon was absolutely delicious we are told. And I will
never have the opportunity to eat mammoth, sadly.
>
Howard Waldrop's _The Ugly Chickens_ is one of the best SF stories ever
written but is not historically accurate regarding the flavour of dodo.
>IOW, this is /not/ "particular about Americans". At least, not when>
historical events are listed.
God may have given us dominion over the earth and the seas but that does
not seem to me to be a license to just wreck it all.
Not even staunch Calvinists feel that way.
All god-given power implies moral responsibilities.
To ignore those is vanity, and that is a sin before the lord,
undeniable that people existed in the 50s and 60s and probably do
today who believe /precisely/ that "dominion" means we can do whatever
we want to with the planet.
Indeed, I would not be surprised if "concern for the environment" is
considered to be a sign of that dreaded theological disease,
modernism, or even that abomination unto the Lord, liberalism, in some
more traditional quarters.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.