Sujet : Re: Most disappointing films.
De : psperson (at) *nospam* old.netcom.invalid (Paul S Person)
Groupes : rec.arts.sf.writtenDate : 04. Mar 2025, 17:57:30
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <ambesj5kquo052k8ehg9nfduu7967q3bpj@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
On Tue, 4 Mar 2025 10:23:19 -0500, Cryptoengineer
<
petertrei@gmail.com> wrote:
On 3/4/2025 12:30 AM, Mike Van Pelt wrote:
In article <vovrtm$18b9h$1@dont-email.me>,
William Hyde <wthyde1953@gmail.com> wrote:
In a conversation the other day I came up with a list of these, and to
my surprise they were all SF/F.
Jackson's Hobbit movies.
After the marvel that was his Lord of the Rings trilogy, I hardly
expected the Hobbit movies to be so very bad. (Maybe they were
OK-ish judged in isolation, but in comparison to his Lord of
the Rings movies, they suffered badly.)
>
Lindsey Ellis did a really excellent analysis as to why the Hobbit
films failed where the LotR films succeeded.
>
The Hobbit: A long awaited autopsy.
Part 1: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uTRUQ-RKfUs
>
The Hobbit: Battle of Five Studios
Part 2: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ElPJr_tKkO4
>
Part 1 is mostly about the difficulties of adapting
The Hobbit to a film, including the critical error of
expanding from 2 to 3 films at the last moment,
In addition to the even more critical error of thinking it needed 2
films to begin with.
Rankin-Bass did it in 80 minutes. Adding Beorn back would have
stretched to ... maybe 90 minutes.
Part 2 is more about the tortured production process,
with the switch of director from del Toro to Jackson,
and the ultra-rushed schedule.
I wasn't aware that PJ was their second choice. Not that I think a del
Toro version would have been any better.
Its worth watching.
I only watch this sort of thing when one is on a DVD/BD I have
purchased, and that is only to make sure the disk -- the whole disk,
or at least as much of it as I can stand, as those extras sometimes
get awfully hard to watch [1] -- plays without defect.
[1] I skipped /The Terror/ when I got it because it was packaged with
and purchased for the original /The Little Shop of Horrors/. I watched
the "features" for /The Terror/, recognized it from when I streamed
it, remembered how awful I had found it then, and skipped it. It was
hard enough to sit through the first time. I should note that /The
Little Shop of Horrors/ was everything you could ask for. It is as if
you were watching a new print for the first time.
-- "Here lies the Tuscan poet Aretino,Who evil spoke of everyone but God,Giving as his excuse, 'I never knew him.'"