Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper

Liste des GroupesRevenir à ras written 
Sujet : Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper
De : psperson (at) *nospam* old.netcom.invalid (Paul S Person)
Groupes : rec.arts.sf.written
Date : 19. May 2025, 17:14:31
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <0nlm2kh8643ftpnlg9net6u7thqfbvj08d@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
On Sun, 18 May 2025 19:13:27 -0700, The Horny Goat <lcraver@home.ca>
wrote:

On Sat, 19 Apr 2025 22:52:50 GMT, scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal)
wrote:
>
In fairness Canada and the US have been "best buddies" pretty much
since 1815 - though no question our friend in the White House has
brought Canada-US relations to a 200 year low point in no more than
three months.
>
Buckle up! 45 months to go!
>
Or less, if congress does their constitutional duty, which
may not happen until after the midterms.
>
In fairness after the midterms the congresscritters will already be in
election mode for 2028 and dang all will in the way of legislation
will get done.
>
This is a feature not a bug...

Not even the Dems are dumb enough to impeach Trump again. Well, one
was, but the Dems themselves (if I understand this correctly) slapped
him down.

I mean, what's the point? They can't convict him now any more than
they could when they controlled both Houses. Not that they have
actually /learned/ anything: a lot of their actions are still based on
how politics was done in 2024 or before, while I think we have passed
through the Looking-Glass and are in a different situation altogether.

Cleaning this mess up is going to be a long hard grind for someone.
--
"Here lies the Tuscan poet Aretino,
Who evil spoke of everyone but God,
Giving as his excuse, 'I never knew him.'"

Date Sujet#  Auteur
24 Feb 25 * (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper47James Nicoll
25 Feb 25 +* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper42Charles Packer
19 Apr 25 i`* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper41Paul S Person
20 Apr 25 i +* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper3Cryptoengineer
20 Apr 25 i i`* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper2James Nicoll
20 Apr 25 i i `- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1James Nicoll
20 Apr 25 i +* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper36Paul S Person
20 Apr 25 i i+* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper4Scott Dorsey
20 Apr 25 i ii`* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper3Bobbie Sellers
20 Apr 25 i ii `* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper2Lynn McGuire
20 Apr 25 i ii  `- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1Bobbie Sellers
20 Apr 25 i i+* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper3William Hyde
21 Apr 25 i ii+- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1Paul S Person
19 May 25 i ii`- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1Robert Woodward
21 Apr 25 i i+* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper6Paul S Person
19 May 25 i ii`* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper5Paul S Person
28 May 25 i ii `* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper4Dimensional Traveler
28 May 25 i ii  `* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper3William Hyde
28 May 25 i ii   `* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper2Cryptoengineer
28 May 25 i ii    `- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1Bobbie Sellers
19 May 25 i i+- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1ted@loft.tnolan.com (Ted Nolan
19 May 25 i i+* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper2Paul S Person
20 May 25 i ii`- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1Dimensional Traveler
19 May 25 i i+* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper18Paul S Person
28 May 25 i ii`* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper17Paul S Person
28 May 25 i ii `* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper16James Nicoll
29 May 25 i ii  `* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper15Paul S Person
29 May 25 i ii   `* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper14Lynn McGuire
30 May 25 i ii    +* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper10Dimensional Traveler
30 May 25 i ii    i`* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper9Scott Dorsey
30 May 25 i ii    i +* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper3Paul S Person
30 May 25 i ii    i i`* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper2Scott Dorsey
31 May 25 i ii    i i `- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1Paul S Person
30 May 25 i ii    i +* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper4Bobbie Sellers
31 May 25 i ii    i i`* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper3Paul S Person
31 May 25 i ii    i i `* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper2Bobbie Sellers
31 May 25 i ii    i i  `- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1Dimensional Traveler
3 Jun06:42 i ii    i `- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1Titus G
30 May 25 i ii    `* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper3Paul S Person
30 May 25 i ii     +- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1James Nicoll
30 May 25 i ii     `- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1William Hyde
19 May 25 i i`- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1William Hyde
19 May 25 i `- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1Paul S Person
28 Feb 25 +* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper2quadibloc
3 Mar 25 i`- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1WolfFan
28 Feb 25 +- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1Lynn McGuire
19 May 25 `- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1Bobbie Sellers

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal