Sujet : Re: (ReacTor) Five Books About Duplicating Human Beings
De : dtravel (at) *nospam* sonic.net (Dimensional Traveler)
Groupes : rec.arts.sf.writtenDate : 24. May 2025, 17:56:02
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <100stn1$qh9g$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 5/24/2025 8:38 AM, Paul S Person wrote:
On Fri, 23 May 2025 19:39:32 +0100, Robert Carnegie
<rja.carnegie@gmail.com> wrote:
<snippo, cloning vs duplication>
I'm not sure what is currently against human cloning,
besides laws against it. Pet cloning, or a process
called cloning, has been available commercially
at least since 2015 (Viagen).
Several ethical systems.
BTW, I think I have seen references to IVF-produced children as "not
human beings" by some of the more ... fanatical ... groups. Clones
would fall under the same category.
And you thought cancelling birth citizenship would be a nightmare! It
may be the thin edge of the wedge.
"No citizenship for those subjected to ultrasound brain-washing in the womb!!!"
-- I've done good in this world. Now I'm tired and just want to be a cranky dirty old man.
(ReacTor) Five Books About Duplicating Human Beings
Re: (ReacTor) Five Books About Duplicating Human Beings
