Re: 25 Classic Books That Have Been Banned

On 5/27/25 09:13, Paul S Person wrote:

On Mon, 26 May 2025 10:54:47 -0700, Bobbie Sellers
<bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> wrote:
 

>
On 5/26/25 08:37, Paul S Person wrote:
>

2. Science is very good (as far as we can tell) at describing a world
(universe)/corrupted by sin/. It can say nothing about one that is
not. It is, IOW, limited in a way it cannot even detect because
nothing it studies is not corrupted. The situation in which the New
Jerusalem descends is generally considered to taking place in a new
world (universe), freed from sin.

>
How do you know that what you are describing as a Universe
corrupted by Sin is real? You are living within the Xtian mythos.
Myth-OS is not a good place to start from whether Xtian, Jewish,
  Islamic, Hindu, Buddhist, Shinto, Norse. or other pagan mythos.

 How do you know that a Universe /not/ corrupted by Sin is real?

Because of the prevalence of death and change.
The standard interpretation is that prior ot the "original sin" of our
mythic parents they were immortal but with sin came death. However
death is universal for complex organisms as shown by countless fossils.
Therefore the myth and its standard interpretation are flawed at best
and likely wrong. Many deaths before homo sapiens evolved. And much
more time passed than allowed for in the standard interpretation of
the various scriptures apart from the Hindu which are very religiously
focused on battles of gods, their avatars and demi-gods in flying chariots.
over very long periods of time.
Further homo sapiens sapiens evolved as shown by many fossils
and likely had its problems with large scale deaths which reduced our
genetic diversity. This may have been caused by plagues or perhaps
by catastrophic ocean rise when the various ice dams collapsed as
the previous Ice Age waned.

 The question cuts both ways. And "Myth-OS"es are everywhere.
 And you somehow left out: atheist, anti-religious bigotry, secular
humanism, and any other religion that denies its own nature.

i do not believe Atheism is a religion. Anti-religious bigotry is over-blown.
Secular humanism is a philosophy not a religion.  Some people are attempting
to create an atheistic church which will depend on the community of people
who are willing to identify as atheists which is problematic in many areas.
In case you had not heard atheists are persecuted far more than
Christians or most other religions.

Note that many of these admit to being philosophies or even
ideologies. But when those function as a "Myth-OS", they act as a
religion.
 This is why attempts to change other people's minds by "citing facts"
does not generally work: what is going on is all too often actually an
attempt to convert them from one religion to another.
 And, BTW, my statement clearly supports the validity of Science. But
only for the Universe we are in.

Well of course we have to specify the validity of science in this
Universe as presently we have no access except through the medium
of imagination. And that is the probably for the best in this world.
bliss -