Re: 25 Classic Books That Have Been Banned

On 31/05/25 21:37, Chris Elvidge wrote:

On 30/05/2025 at 16:53, Scott Dorsey wrote:

Paul S Person  <psperson@old.netcom.invalid> wrote:

>
OK. Why would what I merely /consider/ to be reality have to be
factual? It isn't as if I am claiming it really is reality, only  that
I consider it to be. Or do you want me to prove that I really do
consider to be reality what I consider to be reality?

>
Immanuel Kant addressed this subject very effectively nearly two
centuries
ago, and his work is worth looking up.  Schopenhauer expanded on it as
well.  It's not worth rehashing on Usenet.
--scott
>

>
But he was a real pissant, and very rarely stable.

 And Wittgenstein was a beery swine who was just as sloshed as Schlegel.