Liste des Groupes | Revenir à ras written |
On Sat, 31 May 2025 16:19:40 -0400, William HydeAs part of his campaign the many evils of the Tsarist state were given in great detail, even exaggerated if that was possible, anything and everything was used in the cause. But the cause was never toleration for his party, but the rule of his party. This was fairly clear even when it seemed ludicrous to think that the bolsheviks could ever seize power.
<wthyde1953@gmail.com> wrote:
Paul S Person wrote:He never complained of the Tsar's secret police? He never expressed aOn Sat, 31 May 2025 10:14:59 +0200, nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J.>
Lodder) wrote:
>
<snippo>
>Yes, always the same with religions.>
When a minority the demand tolerance,
once on top they oppress,
Didn't the Bolsheviks follow the same pattern?
I don't think Lenin ever demanded mere toleration. He did a pretty good
job of oppressing even when he was in the minority.
wish for more freedom?
Well, perhaps not. "Russian Communist" might have been better thatThe Bolsheviks were always as small minority before the revolution. After that their ranks were swollen by Mensheviks and other leftists - by no means all of them, of course.
"Bolshevik", as being more inclusive and perhaps extending further
back in time than Lenin's arrival in Moscow.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.