Sujet : Re: 25 Classic Books That Have Been Banned
De : jbb (at) *nospam* notatt.com (Jeff Barnett)
Groupes : rec.arts.sf.written alt.usage.englishDate : 02. Jun 2025, 17:38:41
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <101kk2h$3d48b$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 6/2/2025 4:51 AM, Stefan Ram wrote:
<SNIP>>
There are singularities that are just "coordinate singularities".
All that means is our coordinate system falls apart at a certain spot,
but it does not necessarily mean the physics breaks down there. You
can just switch to a different coordinate system and clear that up.
With a black hole, the general consensus is that any singularity at
the horizon is just a coordinate singularity, but the singularity
in the center of the black hole is a real physical singularity.
As far as I know, people say the Big Bang is also a real singularity,
not just something that comes from the coordinate system.
<SNIP>
Leonard Abrams published a relevant paper on this topic in a Canadian physics journal somewhere between 20-30 years ago as well as delivering lectures on the topic at Cal Tech. He, essentially, showed that the Schwarzschild derivation was mathematically flawed. Essentially S translated the coordinate system and made claims about the analytic continuation of the system. Abrams simply showed that there was no analytic continuation! This doesn't say there are no black holes, but Schwarzschild's mathematics isn't a proof. The acceptance of the paper was cool but no one has properly resurrected the result to my knowledge.
-- Jeff Barnett