Sujet : Re: RI January 2025
De : (at) *nospam* ednolan (ted@loft.tnolan.com (Ted Nolan)
Groupes : rec.arts.sf.writtenDate : 11. Jul 2025, 17:22:49
Autres entêtes
Organisation : loft
Message-ID : <mdcs2pFiejnU1@mid.individual.net>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : trn 4.0-test76 (Apr 2, 2001)
In article <
104rdco$1ibt0$1@dont-email.me>,
Bobbie Sellers <
blissInSanFrancisco@mouse-potato.com> wrote:
>
>
On 6/22/25 23:54, The Horny Goat wrote:
On Mon, 24 Feb 2025 08:46:47 -0800, Paul S Person
<psperson@old.netcom.invalid> wrote:
As to Simon Magus, <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simon_Magus> notes
that the Early Fathers did attribute Gnosticism to him but modern
scholars are divided on whether he actually was a Gnostic or was
merely regarded as one by the Church Fathers. All of whom, since Simon
Magus and Peter the Apostle were contemporaries, were writing a
century or two after he died.
>
That's what I remembered and I was therefore mystified by how Simon
Magus could still be around in the time of Marcus Aurelius.
>
Might there not have been another Simon Magus or a charlatan assuming
the name to increase his reputation?
>
bliss
An ancient Sonny Boy Williamson?
-- columbiaclosings.comWhat's not in Columbia anymore..