Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper

Liste des GroupesRevenir à ras written 
Sujet : Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper
De : kludge (at) *nospam* panix.com (Scott Dorsey)
Groupes : rec.arts.sf.written
Date : 22. Jul 2025, 01:49:07
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Former users of Netcom shell (1989-2000)
Message-ID : <105mn63$813$1@panix2.panix.com>
References : 1 2 3 4
William Hyde  <wthyde1953@gmail.com> wrote:
Scott Dorsey wrote:
William Hyde  <wthyde1953@gmail.com> wrote:
Irrelevant.  Randolph was sick, possibly but not certainly from
syphilis.  Nothing heritable, at any rate.
 
But syphilis -is- heritable, and frequently was inherited in the 19th
century and the early part of the 20th before Dr. Ehrlich's cure.
 
As I understand it, the victim is contagious for a few years, but then,
though still infected, he no longer spreads the disease. So if Randolph
caught it - and it is far from clear that he did - it must have been
well before his marriage.

I mean heritable!  It gets passed on to children and the children grow
up with a congenital infection which causes poor growth and neurological
issues.  Sometimes this happens when the mother no longer has a secondary
infection.  

Not something that happens very often in the west today, but this was a
big deal in the 19th century and figures in a lot of old novels.
--scott
--
"C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."

Date Sujet#  Auteur
24 Feb 25 * (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper70James Nicoll
25 Feb 25 +* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper65Charles Packer
19 Apr 25 i`* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper64Paul S Person
20 Apr 25 i +* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper3Cryptoengineer
20 Apr 25 i i`* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper2James Nicoll
20 Apr 25 i i `- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1James Nicoll
20 Apr 25 i +* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper59Paul S Person
20 Apr 25 i i+* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper4Scott Dorsey
20 Apr 25 i ii`* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper3Bobbie Sellers
20 Apr 25 i ii `* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper2Lynn McGuire
20 Apr 25 i ii  `- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1Bobbie Sellers
20 Apr 25 i i+* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper3William Hyde
21 Apr 25 i ii+- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1Paul S Person
19 May 25 i ii`- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1Robert Woodward
21 Apr 25 i i+* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper9Paul S Person
19 May 25 i ii`* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper8Paul S Person
28 May 25 i ii `* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper7Dimensional Traveler
28 May 25 i ii  +* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper5William Hyde
28 May 25 i ii  i`* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper4Cryptoengineer
28 May 25 i ii  i +- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1Bobbie Sellers
24 Jun 25 i ii  i `* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper2Cryptoengineer
24 Jun 25 i ii  i  `- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1William Hyde
23 Jun 25 i ii  `- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1Paul S Person
19 May 25 i i+- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1ted@loft.tnolan.com (Ted Nolan
19 May 25 i i+* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper2Paul S Person
20 May 25 i ii`- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1Dimensional Traveler
19 May 25 i i+* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper38Paul S Person
28 May 25 i ii`* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper37Paul S Person
28 May 25 i ii `* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper36James Nicoll
29 May 25 i ii  +* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper26Paul S Person
29 May 25 i ii  i`* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper25Lynn McGuire
30 May 25 i ii  i +* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper21Dimensional Traveler
30 May 25 i ii  i i+* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper18Scott Dorsey
30 May 25 i ii  i ii+* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper3Paul S Person
30 May 25 i ii  i iii`* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper2Scott Dorsey
31 May 25 i ii  i iii `- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1Paul S Person
30 May 25 i ii  i ii+* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper13Bobbie Sellers
31 May 25 i ii  i iii+* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper3Paul S Person
31 May 25 i ii  i iiii`* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper2Bobbie Sellers
31 May 25 i ii  i iiii `- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1Dimensional Traveler
23 Jun 25 i ii  i iii`* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper9Paul S Person
24 Jun 25 i ii  i iii `* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper8Cryptoengineer
24 Jun 25 i ii  i iii  `* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper7Titus G
24 Jun 25 i ii  i iii   +* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper4Dimensional Traveler
24 Jun 25 i ii  i iii   i`* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper3Cryptoengineer
25 Jun 25 i ii  i iii   i `* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper2Paul S Person
25 Jun 25 i ii  i iii   i  `- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1William Hyde
24 Jun 25 i ii  i iii   +- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1Paul S Person
24 Jun 25 i ii  i iii   `- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1Robert Woodward
3 Jun 25 i ii  i ii`- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1Titus G
23 Jun 25 i ii  i i+- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1James Nicoll
23 Jun 25 i ii  i i`- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1William Hyde
30 May 25 i ii  i `* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper3Paul S Person
30 May 25 i ii  i  +- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1James Nicoll
30 May 25 i ii  i  `- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1William Hyde
23 Jun 25 i ii  +* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper5Paul S Person
18 Jul22:09 i ii  i`* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper4William Hyde
20 Jul01:44 i ii  i `* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper3Scott Dorsey
21 Jul21:19 i ii  i  `* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper2William Hyde
22 Jul01:49 i ii  i   `- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1Scott Dorsey
23 Jun 25 i ii  +* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper3William Hyde
18 Jul23:00 i ii  i`* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper2William Hyde
21 Jul21:24 i ii  i `- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1William Hyde
24 Jun 25 i ii  `- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1Bobbie Sellers
19 May 25 i i`- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1William Hyde
19 May 25 i `- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1Paul S Person
28 Feb 25 +* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper2quadibloc
3 Mar 25 i`- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1WolfFan
28 Feb 25 +- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1Lynn McGuire
19 May 25 `- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1Bobbie Sellers

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal