Re: Biden Says the Quiet Part Out Loud

On 5/31/24 5:07 PM, BTR1701 wrote:

In article <v3c7er$268m8$2@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
wrote:
 

On 5/30/24 12:28 PM, BTR1701 wrote:

In article <v3a5u7$1ocic$1@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
wrote:
>

On 5/28/24 4:38 PM, BTR1701 wrote:

In article <v34r0d$ksqb$10@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
wrote:
>

On 5/26/24 2:11 PM, BTR1701 wrote:

In article <v2vgau$3eegh$6@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
wrote:
>

On 5/26/24 4:27 AM, The Horny Goat wrote:

On Sat, 25 May 2024 09:29:53 -0400, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:
>

A path to citizenship doesn't happen automatically, takes a while.
>

>
And it's what the US has done since it's been the US.
>

BUT BUT BUT .... 'a path to citizenship' ONLY exists (and IMHO only
SHOULD exist) if your entry to your new country is made by the legal
route in the first place.
>
That's what my daughter did when she applied for and got British
citizenship - and given her occupation she got her work permit pretty
much on her arrival in the UK long before she was eligible for British
citizenship. (She did say that at one point she felt the British
powers that be were cutting the red tape lengthwise...)
>

And Schumer never said it would apply to those here illegally.
That's what Thanny wants you to think, but there's no evidence to the
contrary.

>
The entire press conference he was giving, the questions from the press
he was answering, were about the millions of illegals Biden has allowed
to flood the country since he took office.
>
But you keep doing your gaslighting thing and telling us to ignore our
own lyin' eyes in favor of your semantic word games. You're fooling no
one, Shit Shoes.
>

Hey, liar... how about some REAL facts?
>
"Migrant crossings at U.S.-Mexico border plunge 54% from record highs,
internal figures show
By Camilo Montoya-GalvezUpdated on: May 23, 2024 / 7:50 PM EDT
>
El Paso, Texas - Illegal crossings along the U.S.-Mexico border in May
are down by more than 50% compared to the record highs reported in
December

>
"Record highs reported in December"
>
Who was president in December, Shit Shoes?
>
Jeezus christ, your own 'proof' makes you lose on Usenet today, Shit
Shoes. You're doing my work for me.
>

And Biden has them reduced by 50%.

>
He was the one who let it get to "record highs" in the first place, Shit
Shoes.
>
You don't get to take a victory lap for cleaning up a mess that you made
in the first place.

>
And he's trying to fix it

 He could have just not done it in the first place, Shit Shoes.
 

Nope, he couldn't Shit Face.  Already been debunked, and you've been told that over and over again.

GOP says Biden has all the power he needs to control the border. The reality is far more complicated.
Congressional Republicans argue that President Joe Biden already has all the authority he needs to halt the flow of migrants through the U.S.-Mexico border. They’re making the claim as a bipartisan deal that the president negotiated with senators to expand his authority is facing near-certain defeat.
 The reality about Biden’s powers to control migration is far more complicated.
Without changes to immigration laws or more funding to manage the growing number of migrants arriving at the Southern border, not much of what Biden can try will stick — just as was the case for presidents before him.
 “President Biden needs Congress to be able to address the situation at the border,” said Kathleen Bush-Joseph, a lawyer and policy analyst at the nonpartisan Migration Policy Institute. “That is the simplest way to put it.”

Keep lying Shit Face... I'll just keep posting sources.
https://apnews.com/article/biden-border-election-2024-republicans-3e905afaf7a68387aa58296e6cf91890
YOUR OWN border bill would help, but you're refusing to do anything about it because your side WANTS to keep it status quo.

The $118 billion bipartisan proposal in Congress would overhaul the asylum system to provide faster and tougher enforcement, as well as give presidents new powers to immediately expel migrants if authorities become overwhelmed with the number of people applying for asylum. It also would add $20 billion in funding — a huge influx of cash.

Biden could say he was going to shut down the U.S.-Mexico border entirely, but there would be billions of dollars lost or delayed in trade, and the U.S. would be in violation of international laws that govern what a country must do with refugees.

So you're simply lying, and everybody knows why.  Because doing what you want him to do violates international law, and would cost American BILLIONS of dollars.
And then you could tag Biden for that too.
We all know the game Shit Face.
--
"Thou shalt not make a machine in the likeness of a man’s mind." - OC Bible  25B.G.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/ek8kap93bmk0q5w/D%20U%20N%20E%20Part%20II.jpg?dl=0
Gracie, age 6.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/0es3xolxka455iw/BetterThingsToDo.jpg?dl=0