Re: How Kammie is Scamming Her Pro-Choice Supporters

On Oct 21, 2024 at 2:17:10 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:

On 10/21/2024 3:00 PM, BTR1701 wrote:

 On Oct 21, 2024 at 8:47:35 AM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
 

 On 10/21/2024 2:12 AM, shawn wrote:

   On Sun, 20 Oct 2024 22:56:57 -0700, The Horny Goat <lcraver@home.ca>
   wrote:
  

   On Sun, 20 Oct 2024 22:03:13 -0400, Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net>
   wrote:
 

   In article <vf0rlt$3vje6$3@dont-email.me>, atropos@mac.com wrote:
 

   At all her rallies, Kammie keeps telling her supporters that if she's
   elected, she'll get a national abortion law passed that resets everything
   back to the Roe/Wade status quo.
 
   Except that won't work and she almost certainly knows it.

 
   But her supporters are too stupid to know it.

 
   Wait a minute - I'm a Canadian and know that abortion is for states
   not the feds to legislate on. So how can a presidential candidate not
   know the Constitutional division of powers on this point if I do? (Yes
   I know Kammie did 2 or 3 years of Middle School in Montreal...)

  
   She would enable the change in the same way that Trump did as I've
   heard that we may see two Supreme Court justices retire in the next
   few years.

 
 Imo, it'd be a meaningful step forward to legally admit that all these
 abortion restrictions actually amount to an "establishment of religion".

 
 One need not believe in an omnipotent sky-tyrant to believe that killing a
 baby in the womb is wrong any more than one needs to believe in an
omnipotent
 sky-tyrant to believe that killing an adult person is wrong.

 
'Wrong', in this context, is exactly equivalent to "sinful" ...whether
you think the concept descends from Valhalla or your inner whisperer.

Not any more than wrong in the context of the adult human is "sinful".