Re: Supreme Court grants review Martin v. United States wrongful FBI SWAT raid

Liste des GroupesRevenir à ra tv 
Sujet : Re: Supreme Court grants review Martin v. United States wrongful FBI SWAT raid
De : dannyb (at) *nospam* panix.com (danny burstein)
Groupes : rec.arts.tv
Date : 01. Feb 2025, 19:33:16
Autres entêtes
Organisation : PANIX Public Access Internet and UNIX, NYC
Message-ID : <vnlpdc$dac$1@reader2.panix.com>
References : 1
User-Agent : nn/6.7.3
In <vnlk5b$6l2g$1@dont-email.me> "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> writes:

[snip]

It's an Institute for Justice case.

damn, I hate it when Ihave to applaud the IJ...

Here's SCOTUSBLOG

since you mentioned SCOTUSBLOG, just making sure you're aware
of this allegation:

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/crime/tom-goldstein-scotusblog-tax-indictment-b2681214.html



--
_____________________________________________________
Knowledge may be power, but communications is the key
     dannyb@panix.com
[to foil spammers, my address has been double rot-13 encoded]

Date Sujet#  Auteur
1 Feb 25 * Supreme Court grants review Martin v. United States wrongful FBI SWAT raid6Adam H. Kerman
1 Feb 25 +- Re: Supreme Court grants review Martin v. United States wrongful FBI SWAT raid1BTR1701
1 Feb 25 +* Re: Supreme Court grants review Martin v. United States wrongful FBI SWAT raid2danny burstein
1 Feb 25 i`- Re: Supreme Court grants review Martin v. United States wrongful FBI SWAT raid1Adam H. Kerman
27 Apr 25 +- Re: Supreme Court grants review Martin v. United States wrongful FBI SWAT raid1Adam H. Kerman
29 Apr 25 `- Re: Supreme Court grants review Martin v. United States wrongful FBI SWAT raid1Adam H. Kerman

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal