Re: Mother arrested because 10 year old son walked alone to store

On 2/23/2025 1:02 PM, BTR1701 wrote:

On Feb 22, 2025 at 9:18:41 PM PST, "shawn" <nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com>
wrote:
 

On Sun, 23 Feb 2025 04:44:06 -0000 (UTC), "Adam H. Kerman"
<ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
>

Three months ago, a mother took one child to the doctor. While at the
doctor, her 10 year old son, left home alone, walked a mile to the
store. Now, he didn't have her permission but it wasn't a big deal for
the mother as her son hadn't gone anywhere he wasn't familiar with.
>
The cop that showed up at the house arrested her for reckless
endangerment, stating that it was illegal (in Georgia) for a 10 year old
to walk alone.

>
I guess I broke the law as a child more than once.

 All the time. We weren't just walking down to the store, either.
 On a typical Saturday, we would set out on our bikes first thing in the
morning and be gone all day. (We had to be gone before dad got going or we'd
end up having to do yard work all day.) Our rule was we had to be home for
dinner before the streetlights came on, but for the rest of the day, our
parents had no idea where we were while we were out in the woods miles away
riding the trails, building forts, playing ball, etc. Today, that would be
(absurdly) chargeable as criminal child abuse/neglect.
 The frequent response is, "Well, we live in more dangerous times now", but
that's completely false. Per the FBI crime statistics, it's actually much
*safer* now in terms of child assault/abduction/murder than it was in the
"good old days" of the 50s, 60s, 70s, and 80s. When I was 10 years old, I had
some weirdo pull up beside me in a black van while I was out riding my bike
and ask if I wanted a ride and kept trying to convince me to come with him. I
told him to get lost and when he kept following me, rode toward the police
station. Once he realized where I was going, he sped away.
 The difference is that thanks to 24-hour cable news, now you hear about cases
you never would have heard about back then. During those times, there were
essentially only three channels on TV-- ABC, CBS, and NBC-- and they had only
30 minutes per day to bring you the news from the whole world. So the story
about a little girl that got abducted in Idaho was pushed aside for a story
about the latest incursion by the Soviet Union or the political battles in
Congress. Then came CNN and 24-hour news and rather than have to cut stories,
they were struggling to fill the schedule all day, every single day, and
suddenly you started hearing about crimes you never knew had been occurring
the entire time and the perception was that suddenly there was an explosion of
child molesters out there, hiding behind every shrub and tree trunk.
 

Finally, prosecutors decide not to proceed but charges are dropped
WITHOUT prejudice, which allows them to be refiled again within two
years of the incident.
>
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L0CKus1J1DU

I don't like that Google now leads with its AI's response. Nevertheless, here's what it said:
    "Whether children are safer today is complex and depends on many factors, including location, socioeconomic conditions, and individual circumstances. However, there are some signs that children are safer today than in the past."