Sujet : Re: Libraries won't stand up for First Amendment
De : ahk (at) *nospam* chinet.com (Adam H. Kerman)
Groupes : rec.arts.tvDate : 14. Mar 2025, 18:50:10
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vr1q8i$1okb3$2@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : trn 4.0-test77 (Sep 1, 2010)
Rhino <
no_offline_contact@example.com> wrote:
On 2025-03-14 12:36 PM, moviePig wrote:
On 3/14/2025 12:15 PM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
. . .
It's about how miserable life is in the West Bank for Palestinians. I
have no objection to its production. I'm sure it's all full of political
spin and intended to be manipulative. It may even be good propaganda.
Interesting question: Is 'good propaganda' an oxymoron?
Labelling any particular bit of propaganda as good or bad is surely a
moral judgement by the person perceiving it. I wonder if Adam might have
meant "effective" where he said "good"?
Only moviePig could feign misunderstanding of "propaganda". A value
judgement about whether propaganda is good or bad is about
persuassiveness, not morality.
. . .
Libraries won't stand up for First Amendment
Re: Libraries won't stand up for First Amendment