Sujet : Re: The First Swedes
De : atropos (at) *nospam* mac.com (BTR1701)
Groupes : rec.arts.tvDate : 24. Mar 2025, 00:20:12
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vrq4vc$3fb4h$3@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : Usenapp/0.92.2/l for MacOS
On Mar 23, 2025 at 3:10:33 PM PDT, "moviePig" <
nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
On 3/23/2025 5:20 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On Mar 23, 2025 at 2:06:45 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
On 3/23/2025 3:21 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On Mar 23, 2025 at 11:47:15 AM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
On 3/23/2025 12:56 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On Mar 23, 2025 at 9:05:27 AM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com>
wrote:
On 3/22/2025 11:41 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On Mar 22, 2025 at 3:29:51 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com>
wrote:
On 3/22/2025 5:41 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On Mar 22, 2025 at 1:19:42 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com>
wrote:
On 3/22/2025 3:48 PM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
State TV in Sweden (SVT) has produced a big budget series called
HISTORY OF
SWEDEN.
This is who the government wants its people to believe were are
the first
Swedes:
https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/1903440799997796352/vid/avc1/1484x1080/zSkOkYQL6jojG3pq.mp4?tag=16
No fucking way. Isn't the theory that as primitive man moved
further and
further north, skin pigmentation lightened? I've never read
that skin
lighted after people moved into colder and colder climates.
I'm horrified that they weren't vegetarians.
They would be dark-skinned when they arrived, and evolve to
lighter-skinned to maintain Vitamin D levels despite
reduced sunlight.
People didn't come directly from Africa to Scandinavia.
They'd already
evolved
lighter skin by living in Europe for centuries by the time they got
to the
high northern latitudes.
The early inhabitants of Sweden, dating back to the Bromme culture
post-Ice
Age (around 12,000 BC) and through the Neolithic and Iron Ages, were
overwhelmingly of northern European descent-- hunter-gatherers,
farmers, and
later Norse populations with light skin, varied eye colors, and
genetics
tracing back to local European ancestry, not Africa. Genetic studies
spanning
2,000 years (as detailed in ScienceDirect's research) show
influences from
the
eastern Baltic, British-Irish Isles, and southern Europe, but zero
indication
of direct African migration in Scandinavia during these periods.
Perhaps I should've said they would be *darker* skinned when they
arrived. And they would've stayed darker until the evolutionary
pressure (Vitamin D) worked its magic.
I don't know they'd have been as dark as those actors, and
even less do
I know the motives of everyone behind this portrayal. Nevertheless,
afaics, they're supported by at least *some* scientific rationale.
It's no coincidence that the populace of indigenous white nations
across the
globe are all suddenly being told that their countries and cultures
were all
really black all along.
This is a coordinated politically-motivated agenda to erase white
culture
everywhere it exists and pretend that white people are just
some genetic
mistake that needs to be corrected.
I'm wondering what (desirable) bits of 'white culture' are being erased.
I'm wondering what you find undesirable that's unique to white people.
What does your 'white culture' consist of ...that I can choose among?
I think you've just shown us the root of your problem.
That I'm unsure what you meant by 'white culture'? Do elaborate...
That you can't think of a single example of white culture on your own.
Iirc, I've hitherto never used the phrase or concept. You've introduced
it here. Please elucidate what you meant. Or don't.
I think I won't because you'd either have to be a moron or playing games not
to be able to think of one example of white culture on your own, and since I
know you're not a moron, I'll decline to play your game.