Liste des Groupes | Revenir à ra tv |
On 4/30/2025 2:21 PM, BTR1701 wrote:On Apr 30, 2025 at 8:37:27 AM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
On 4/29/2025 11:53 PM, BTR1701 wrote:On Apr 29, 2025 at 8:28:00 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
On 4/29/2025 11:20 PM, BTR1701 wrote:On Apr 29, 2025 at 7:38:55 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com>
wrote:
On 4/29/2025 10:10 PM, BTR1701 wrote:On Apr 29, 2025 at 1:32:51 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com>
wrote:
As he was merely accused, any "shoulds" are all in one's biases. I.e.,
he's entitled to the same "help" as an innocent you would be.
I wouldn't be entitled to a judge running cover for me while she
directs me
to
a back door to evade the cops, either.
*If* she thought you were illegally pursued, it'd be her *duty*.
No, it wouldn't.
Sure it would, if not legally then ethically.
Well, ethical civil disobedience comes with a price. MLK and Gandhi both
recognized that and did their time for breaking the law in pursuit of their
higher cause. This judge should be prepared to do the same.
But if she believed the warrant invalid then, civil or uncivil, her
disobedience would be inadvertent.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.