Liste des Groupes | Revenir à ra tv |
On 4/30/2025 3:24 PM, BTR1701 wrote:On Apr 30, 2025 at 11:37:37 AM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
On 4/30/2025 2:21 PM, BTR1701 wrote:On Apr 30, 2025 at 8:37:27 AM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
On 4/29/2025 11:53 PM, BTR1701 wrote:On Apr 29, 2025 at 8:28:00 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com>
wrote:
On 4/29/2025 11:20 PM, BTR1701 wrote:On Apr 29, 2025 at 7:38:55 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com>
wrote:
On 4/29/2025 10:10 PM, BTR1701 wrote:On Apr 29, 2025 at 1:32:51 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com>
wrote:
As he was merely accused, any "shoulds" are all in one's
biases. I.e.,
he's entitled to the same "help" as an innocent you would be.
I wouldn't be entitled to a judge running cover for me while she
directs me
to
a back door to evade the cops, either.
*If* she thought you were illegally pursued, it'd be her *duty*.
No, it wouldn't.
Sure it would, if not legally then ethically.
Well, ethical civil disobedience comes with a price. MLK and Gandhi both
recognized that and did their time for breaking the law in pursuit of
their
higher cause. This judge should be prepared to do the same.
But if she believed the warrant invalid then, civil or uncivil, her
disobedience would be inadvertent.
She had *no business* checking the warrant in the first place. She has no
jurisdiction over federal immigration law. She's no different than any other
citizen with regard to the ICE arrest. John Doe on the street can't walk up
to
an ongoing ICE operation and start demanding to see paperwork and neither
can
a state court judge. And if either one of them do so, they can be arrested
and
charged with obstruction.
How does that work, then? Can you be having dinner at home with your
wife and, when a knock at the door turns out to be a stranger claiming
to have a warrant to take her away, you can't say "Show me"?
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.