Liste des Groupes | Revenir à ra tv |
In articleNo, there isn't "always an excuse" for why it might be "different". Consider, for example, the recent discussion of RuPaul's book-banning.
<17bc6a65e0fefe3d$133203$1098985$c8d58268@news.newsdemon.com>,
moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
On 3/12/2024 11:36 PM, BTR1701 wrote:Yes, there's always an excuse for why "it's different when we do it".In article <75r1vidlcuq3nd6lsnd4o1s254bn9khpgu@4ax.com>,>
The Horny Goat <lcraver@home.ca> wrote:
>On Tue, 12 Mar 2024 12:10:11 -0400, Rhino>
<no_offline_contact@example.com> wrote:
>A bill passed earlier in Trudeau's Reign of Error made people eligible>
for two years in prison for "mis-gendering" (i.e. correctly identifying
the gender of an individual). They got away with that so now they've
upped the ante to put us in prison for life for hate speech.
I suppose I could be in trouble then since I have publicly and online
denounced the Gladue decision and the UNDRIP.
Has anyone pointed out to Trudeau how ironic it is that a guy who has
been caught in blackface is now proposing life sentences for hate
speech?
>
Has anyone suggested he lead by example and check himself into the
nearest maximum security prison?
Trudeau's blackface wasn't a clear expression of hate ...which 'hate
speech' presumably is.
Ask any BLM/NAACP/black racial grievance group if they consider
appearing blackface to be hate and I bet they have a different standard
than you do. And the rules of political correctness say their definition
controls.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.