Re: Canada to Start Punishing People for Pre-Crime

In article <17bc7ef34c89321a$26$2906873$52d51861@news.newsdemon.com>,
 moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:

On 3/13/2024 7:25 PM, BTR1701 wrote:

moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:

On 3/13/2024 4:14 PM, BTR1701 wrote:

In article
<17bc6a65e0fefe3d$133203$1098985$c8d58268@news.newsdemon.com>,
moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
>

On 3/12/2024 11:36 PM, BTR1701 wrote:

In article <75r1vidlcuq3nd6lsnd4o1s254bn9khpgu@4ax.com>,
The Horny Goat <lcraver@home.ca> wrote:
>

On Tue, 12 Mar 2024 12:10:11 -0400, Rhino
<no_offline_contact@example.com> wrote:
>

A bill passed earlier in Trudeau's Reign of Error made people
eligible for two years in prison for "mis-gendering" (i.e. correctly
identifying the gender of an individual). They got away with tha
so now they've upped the ante to put us in prison for life for
hate speech.

>
I suppose I could be in trouble then since I have publicly and online
denounced the Gladue decision and the UNDRIP.

>
Has anyone pointed out to Trudeau how ironic it is that a guy who has
been caught in blackface is now proposing life sentences for hate
speech?
>
Has anyone suggested he lead by example and check himself into the
nearest maximum security prison?

>
Trudeau's blackface wasn't a clear expression of hate ...which 'hate
speech' presumably is.

>
Yes, there's always an excuse for why "it's different when we do it".
>
Ask any BLM/NAACP/black racial grievance group if they consider
appearing blackface to be hate and I bet they have a different standard
than you do. And the rules of political correctness say their definition
controls.

>
No, there isn't "always an excuse" for why it might be "different".
Consider, for example, the recent discussion of RuPaul's book-banning.
>
Meanwhile, the question of 'hate' is determined by the offender's state
of mind, not the offendee's.

 
Not according to all the woke DEI training everyone has to go through these
days. Your intent doesn't matter. It's the offended person's feelings that
matter.
 
That's why people can get fired for using the word niggardly. Doesn't
matter if the word has no racial meaning. Doesn't matter that the person
who used it had no intent to offend. All that matters is that a stupid
person with a stunted vocabulary was offended.

 
'Training' is presumably to let people know what things might be
unexpectedly injurious.

No, they don't go through a list of what's offensive. They just tell you
that it doesn't matter what you meant or intended. Only the offended
person's thoughts and feelings matter.

'Hate' is what might be inferred of someone who does such things despite
already knowing.
 
By now, we'd both bet that 'niggardly' is used primarily to taunt.

Presumption of guilt. One of America's core values, amirite?