Re: NBC Historian Takes Media's "Bloodbath" Insanity To A Whole New Level

On Fri, 22 Mar 2024 06:57:24 -0400, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:
 

On 3/21/24 12:51 PM, moviePig wrote:

On 3/21/2024 11:04 AM, FPP wrote:

On 3/20/24 10:42 PM, moviePig wrote:

On 3/20/2024 7:54 PM, BTR1701 wrote:

On Mar 20, 2024 at 3:15:33 PM PDT, ""Adam H. Kerman""
<ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
>

BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:

Mar 19, 2024 at 8:26:17 PM PDT, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:

On 2024-03-20 02:46:53 +0000, BTR1701 said:

What if the cops held the door open for them. Is that still
unauthorized?

>

Lie: The rioters were invited into the Capitol by police

>

There is clear video of the police holding the door open for
people who were
later found guilty of unauthorized entry.

>

How does that logically hold up?

>
With that evidence, why wasn't the charge of unauthorized entry
withdrawn or dismissed? Seems to me that both the prosecution and
judge
were obligated to do so.

>
One would think. Obviously this only applies to a very small number
of people
who were there that day but for those to whom it did apply, it seems
that as a
matter of law one cannot be guilty of unauthorized entry if the
people in
charge of authorizing you let you in.

>
Indeed.  Not if one remains in the area he was let into.

>
>
Jesus, pig... you don't believe that shit do you?  Judges and juries
sure didn't.
>
https://www.cnn.com/2022/01/04/politics/fact-check-capitol-insurrection-january-6-lies/index.html
>

>
I believe pretty much that whole article, including the admission that a
couple of police might've allowed a couple of rioters in.  But what I
was addressing is the fact that allowing them into the building doesn't
equate to allowing them into Pelosi's office to shit on her desk.

>
Breaking in the windows with a battering ram, and smashing the doors
down in kind of negates any "they allowed them in" argument.
Throwing aside cops and throwing barricades down is the same.
>
If you walked in a broken door or window, just a few feet away from
where rioters were beating and brutalizing uniformed police officers, I
don't see ANY argument to be made that you weren't aware that what you
were doing was illegal.

 So you agree that the BLM "protests" were an insurrection.  Good to
know.  Now if I could only find your posts decrying those events and
demanding arrests.
 I *know* they must be out there somewhere.  Perhaps you could find and
repost a few of them for us?