Liste des Groupes | Revenir à ra tv |
On 3/22/24 4:26 PM, BTR1701 wrote:On Mar 22, 2024 at 4:08:21 AM PDT, "FPP" <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:
On 3/21/24 4:23 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
You're comparing the text of an amendment to 200+ years of SupremeNope, it was perfectly apt, and nothing you cited changed that.
Court jurisprudence interpreting an amendment.
SCALIA. Remember him?
>
Because every time I bring him up to you about how no amendment is
sacrosanct (not even the second), you fall into that coma again.
No, I don't. Every time you bring that up, I ask you whether you think that
it'd be okay for the government to make exceptions to Amendment XIX and
prohibit women from voting since "no amendment is sacrosanct", after all.
Or since "no amendment is sacrosanct", it'd be okay for the government to
prohibit black people from voting (Amendment XV) and allow people to be
owned as slaves (Amendment XIII).
And that's when *you* go into a coma.
If this SCOTUS has proven anything, it's that the justices can do
whatever they like. Your bullshit rules no longer apply to a court
that's corrupt.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.