Re: NBC Historian Takes Media's "Bloodbath" Insanity To A Whole New Level

On 3/23/24 11:40 AM, moviePig wrote:

On 3/23/2024 10:22 AM, NoBody wrote:

On Fri, 22 Mar 2024 06:57:24 -0400, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:
>

On 3/21/24 12:51 PM, moviePig wrote:

On 3/21/2024 11:04 AM, FPP wrote:

On 3/20/24 10:42 PM, moviePig wrote:

On 3/20/2024 7:54 PM, BTR1701 wrote:

On Mar 20, 2024 at 3:15:33 PM PDT, ""Adam H. Kerman""
<ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
>

BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:

Mar 19, 2024 at 8:26:17 PM PDT, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:

On 2024-03-20 02:46:53 +0000, BTR1701 said:

What if the cops held the door open for them. Is that still
unauthorized?

>

Lie: The rioters were invited into the Capitol by police

>

There is clear video of the police holding the door open for
people who were
later found guilty of unauthorized entry.

>

How does that logically hold up?

>
With that evidence, why wasn't the charge of unauthorized entry
withdrawn or dismissed? Seems to me that both the prosecution and
judge
were obligated to do so.

>
One would think. Obviously this only applies to a very small number
of people
who were there that day but for those to whom it did apply, it seems
that as a
matter of law one cannot be guilty of unauthorized entry if the
people in
charge of authorizing you let you in.

>
Indeed.  Not if one remains in the area he was let into.

>
>
Jesus, pig... you don't believe that shit do you?  Judges and juries
sure didn't.
>
https://www.cnn.com/2022/01/04/politics/fact-check-capitol-insurrection-january-6-lies/index.html
>

>
I believe pretty much that whole article, including the admission that a
couple of police might've allowed a couple of rioters in.  But what I
was addressing is the fact that allowing them into the building doesn't
equate to allowing them into Pelosi's office to shit on her desk.

>
Breaking in the windows with a battering ram, and smashing the doors
down in kind of negates any "they allowed them in" argument.
Throwing aside cops and throwing barricades down is the same.
>
If you walked in a broken door or window, just a few feet away from
where rioters were beating and brutalizing uniformed police officers, I
don't see ANY argument to be made that you weren't aware that what you
were doing was illegal.

>
So you agree that the BLM "protests" were an insurrection.  Good to
know.  Now if I could only find your posts decrying those events and
demanding arrests.
>
I *know* they must be out there somewhere.  Perhaps you could find and
repost a few of them for us?

>
Did you look under "Attempts To Undo A Presidential Election"?...

 Protests against systematic murder of blacks by the State are different from trying to overthrow a government by force and violence.