Re: Organized Gangs of Illegals Prowl Countryside for Homes to Steal

shawn <nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com> wrote:

Tue, 26 Mar 2024 16:10:16 -0000 (UTC), Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:

BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:

Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:

ahk@chinet.com wrote:

. . .

Neither are they "squatters" for the properties in question were never
abandoned. In your New York example, the criminal falsely told the
police he was a tenant. The police did not believe it. Strange, though,
that they failed to arrest him for making a false statement to the
police in a criminal investigation. Isn't that obstruction of justice?

As I understand it, the squatter claiming to be a renter means it's no
longer a police matter.

The police matter would be them responding to the fuckers I shot when I
came home and found them in my house.

Let's ignore shooting anybody.

I don't see why the police can't make an arrest of the criminals. The
rightful occupant calls the police, demonstrates evidence of occupancy
like a key to the lock, showing identification, mail with his own name
on it, utility bills, possibly even finding his own lease. Maybe there
is damage to a door or window.

The criminal claiming to be the rightful tenant has lied. He can be
charged with a crime for lying, for the breaking and entering, and for
criminal trespass.

Make the arrest. It is indeed a criminal matter.

That would be true in almost any other state. My only guess is the
police have become so unsure of any action being taken against
criminals now that if there is any doubt about the outcome they are
hesitant to go through the motions. Hard to otherwise explain why they
wouldn't take the obvious illegal occupants of the home into custody.

To the extant that police refuse to protect and defend honest
law-abiding taxpayers, I say "Defend the police." We don't need police
who won't arrest criminals.