Re: BLM and Rittenhouse

On 3/29/2024 2:20 PM, BTR1701 wrote:

In article <uu6ij9$b577$7@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
wrote:
 

On 3/28/24 6:06 PM, BTR1701 wrote:

moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:

On 3/28/2024 4:44 PM, BTR1701 wrote:

On Mar 28, 2024 at 12:47:48 PM PDT, "moviePig" <never@nothere.com> wrote:
>

On 3/28/2024 2:05 PM, The Horny Goat wrote:

On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 10:26:49 -0400, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:
>

Because BLM ain't racist like you.

>
BLM isn't racist?
HaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHa

>
"Black lives matter" is not an inherently racist sentiment.

>
But the people who run the organization are quite racist indeed.

>
Presumably, you mean that they believe blacks to be a superior race. I
don't think human nature works that way ...nor is that belief necessary
to the organization's stated aim.

>
Well, at least we agree that all the claims of "white supremacy" that we
constantly hear about from progs are bullshit.

 

Scott followed up to say that the definition of a white nationalist is
someone believing "the white race is superior to all other races"

 (1) Mind your attributions, Shit-Shoes. I didn't say what your quote
levels claim I did.
 (2) That's not the definition of a white nationalist.
 A nationalist is someone who believes in the policy or doctrine of
asserting or giving primacy to the interests of one's own nation viewed
as separate from the interests of other nations or the international
community.
 A white nationalist is someone who believes all that and is white.
 

and asked, "Do you believe that white nationalists are racist?"

 The answer would be-- like most groups of people-- some are and most
aren't.
 Just as black nationalists, taken as a whole, would count a few racists
among their group while most are just people advocating that the
interests of their own country should be the priority.

What, then, shall we call someone who advocates for a "white nation"?