Liste des Groupes | Revenir à ra tv |
On 3/30/24 3:52 PM, BTR1701 wrote:In article <uu9d3v$1363u$3@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
wrote:
On 3/29/24 1:49 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
Nope. Just because you keep repeating it doesn't make it so.>Jesus, can you read?You're not the NY Times.
>
New York Times v. United States, 403 U.S. 713 (1971)
>
Don't have to be. Nowhere in the opinion did the Court limit its
decision to only huge legacy media corporations. And in subsequent
decisions has recognized the speech of ordinary citizens doing nothing
more than posting on the internet as protected by the Free Press Clause.
>
This has been explained to you for decades. Decades...
>
No, it's so because the Supreme Court says it's so.
The right wing asshole Supreme Court you mean?
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.