Liste des Groupes | Revenir à ra tv |
In article <uubnl9$1q8ej$2@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>Nope, I claimed no such thing. You've been shown evidence for decades that man made climate change would devastate the planet.
wrote:
On 3/30/24 5:10 PM, BTR1701 wrote:You're claiming I've been told for decades that Hutt couldn't findIn article <hA_NN.733321$xHn7.585962@fx14.iad>,You've been told this for decades.
trotsky <gmsingh@email.com> wrote:
>On 3/30/24 2:58 PM, BTR1701 wrote:>In article <uu9csk$1363u$1@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>>
wrote:
>On 3/29/24 1:45 PM, BTR1701 wrote:>In article <uu6im7$b577$8@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
wrote:
>On 3/28/24 2:42 PM, BTR1701 wrote:>In article <uu4adb$3mth9$2@dont-email.me>,>
"Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
>Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:>shawn <nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com> wrote:>On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 02:55:30 +0000, BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com>
wrote:>Just saw on the news that Joe Biden has pledged that the
government will "pay the entire cost" of rebuilding the
Baltimore bridge.>Huh? Shouldn't the shipping company and its insurance agency foot
the bill? It's like he just can't wait for any opportunity to
fuck the taxpayer.>And when it's rebuilt, obviously it can't be renamed the Francis
Scott Key Bridge. I mean, "old straight racist white guy",
amirite? So what will its new name be?>I submit the "Saint George Floyd of Fentanyl Memorial Bridge".>The federal government can act to get repairs started today while
the lawyers act to collect any money due from the
company/insurance.The bridge won't be repaired. It'll be 5 to 7 years at least.>
Here's an article from the Baltimore Sun. Turn off javascript to
read.
>
https://www.baltimoresun.com/2024/03/27/how-long-to-rebuild-key-bridg
e/
>
Ignore "rebuild" in the headline. No one is saying it can be
rebuilt. It's going to be replaced with something brand new. I'm
sure the piers will both be relocated closer to shore.
And higher, too. I drove across the Key Bridge regularly when I was a
DC denizen and it was kinda scary how high up you got with seemingly
very little to stop you from going over the side if you lost control.
>The replacement will have to take into account larger vessels and>
sea level rise
Which is non-existent pretty much everywhere. There's been no sea
level rise over the last 12 years at the beach down the street from
me; when I visited Miami's South Beach two years ago, the ocean was
in the same place it was in the pictures of my visit 20 years earlier
(despite AlGore's insistence that Miami would be underwater by 2011);
Plymouth Rock isn't underwater; the water level around the base of
the Statue of Liberty hasn't changed since it was erected, etc., etc.
This has been explained to you for decades. Decades...
Liar.Over and over and over and you still repeat the same old bullshit as>
everything around us goes to shit.
Given that the enviro-kooks have been predicting sea level rise since
the late 90s, even famously direly warning that Miami would be
underwater by 2011,
Shockingly I googled this and it returned zero hits.
Google Search is run by an AI that doesn't even recognize the existence
of white people. The Agenda is baked into its algorithms. Its search
results are no longer worthy of trust and confidence.
>
Regardless, I can't believe you even needed to check Google to see
whether the enviro-loons have been screeching about sea level rise. It's
kinda one of their articles of faith, Hutt, you slouching pus-bucket.
>
anything about enviro-kooks pushing sea-level rise on Google?
Do tell...
(Your bullshit doesn't even make coherent sense anymore.)
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.