Re: Dispatches from Clown World: Actual NY Times Headline

In article <17c1cda372b1642b$139251$3265$48d50260@news.newsdemon.com>,
  trotsky <gmsingh@email.com> wrote:
 

On 3/30/24 3:59 PM, BTR1701 wrote:

In article <uu9es2$13c3i$14@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
wrote:
>

On 3/29/24 2:11 PM, BTR1701 wrote:

In article <uu6i8g$b577$1@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
wrote:
>

On 3/28/24 1:51 PM, BTR1701 wrote:

In article <uu3uu2$3kj1o$3@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
wrote:
>

On 3/26/24 2:04 PM, BTR1701 wrote:

In article <6pv50jlju65cqqudaqels4bmif82852roh@4ax.com>,
      shawn <nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com> wrote:

>

He overstated the value to the banks and understated (or stated
correctly) the value to the IRS.

>
The IRS is a federal agency. How does the state of New York have
jurisdiction to prosecute a federal tax case?
>

Where is the Trump Org situated again?

>
Doesn't matter.
>
If the Trump Org engaged in counterfeiting currency, the NY D.A.
wouldn't have authority to prosecute that crime just because the company
is registered in New York. Counterfeiting is a federal crime and the
state doesn't have jurisdiction over it.

>

But he didn't. He screwed the people and New York.

>
If the company passed counterfeit currency in New York, it would have
screwed the people of New York. If the company passed counterfeit
currency at city-run facilities, that would have screwed over the
government of New York. That still wouldn't give New York jurisdiction
over a federal crime.

>
No response here, I see. Convenient.
>

He screwed New York, not the Federal Government.

>
Jurisdiction is not determined by who was "screwed over", dipshit.

>

Crime committed in NY. It cheated the taxpayers and banks in NY...
dum-dum.

>
So why was the 9-11 investigation and prosecutions FBI and federal court
jurisdiction?
>
Crime committed in NY. It killed the people and destroyed the buildings
in NY...

 

https://www.congress.gov/107/plaws/publ56/PLAW-107publ56.htm
>
   To deter and punish terrorist acts in the United States and around the
    world, to enhance law enforcement investigatory tools, and for other
              purposes. <<NOTE: Oct. 26, 2001 -  [H.R. 3162]>>
>
      Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the
United States of America <<NOTE: Uniting and Strengthening America by
Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism
(USA PATRIOT ACT) Act of 2001.>> in Congress assembled,

 Looky there, Effa. Even Hutt knows why the federal government, not the
state of New York, prosecuted the 9-11 crimes.
 When you find yourself more ignorant than Hutt, that should be one of
those watershed moments in life that cause you to do some serious
self-reflection.